[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch 27/30] xen/events: Only force affinity mask for percpu interrupts
- To: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:06:59 +0100
- Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>, afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@xxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@xxxxxxxxx>, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-ntb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Karthikeyan Mitran <m.karthikeyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:07:03 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 18:20, boris ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
>> cpumask. That does not make sense.
>>
>> The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity() already picks a
>> single target CPU out of the affinity mask and the actual target is stored
>> in the effective CPU mask, so destroying the user chosen affinity mask
>> which might contain more than one CPU is wrong.
>>
>> Change the implementation so that the channel is bound to CPU0 at the XEN
>> level and leave the affinity mask alone. At startup of the interrupt
>> affinity will be assigned out of the affinity mask and the XEN binding will
>> be updated.
>
> If that's the case then I wonder whether we need this call at all and
> instead bind at startup time.
I was wondering about that, but my knowledge about the Xen internal
requirements is pretty limited. The current set at least survived basic
testing by Jürgen.
Thanks,
tglx
|