Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/alternative: support "not feature" and ALTERNATIVE_TERNARY

[Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 19.01.21 13:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:35:42PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > In fact this should rather be named "X86_FEATURE_TRUE", as this is its
> > semantics.
> >
> > And I think I can define it to the value 0xffff instead of using a
> > "real" bit for it.
> A real bit is cheap - a special value to pay attention to in the future
> not so much. Also we do have X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS already which has a
> similar purpose...
Oh, well hidden. :-)

I'll use that one.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature