Re: [PATCH] Fix error: array subscript has type 'char' [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] Fix error: array subscript has type 'char' 
[and 1 more messages]"):
> I don't think I've ever come across that part of a platform
> API/ABI spec. Instead my understanding so far was that good
> platform headers would be ignorant of the user's choice of
> char's signed-ness (wherever compilers offer such a choice,
> but I think all that I've ever worked with did). At the very
> least gcc's doc doesn't warn about any possible
> incompatibilities resulting from use of -fsigned-char or
> -funsigned-char (or their bitfield equivalents, for that
> matter).

Well, I've considered this and I still don't think changing to
-funsigned-char is good idea.

Are you OK with me checking in the current patch or should I ask the
other committers for a second opinion ?

Thanks,
Ian.