[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] sched: core: save IRQ state during locking
On 23.02.21 03:34, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: With XEN preemption enabled, scheduler functions can be called with IRQs disabled (for example, at end of IRQ handler), so we should save and restore IRQ state in schedulers code. This breaks core scheduling. Waiting for another sibling with interrupts disabled is an absolute no go, as deadlocks are the consequence. You could (in theory) make preemption and core scheduling mutually exclusive, but this would break the forward path to mutexes etc. Juergen Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/common/sched/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/sched/core.c b/xen/common/sched/core.c index 9745a77eee..7e075613d5 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched/core.c +++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c @@ -2470,7 +2470,8 @@ static struct vcpu *sched_force_context_switch(struct vcpu *vprev, * sched_res_rculock has been dropped. */ static struct sched_unit *sched_wait_rendezvous_in(struct sched_unit *prev, - spinlock_t **lock, int cpu, + spinlock_t **lock, + unsigned long *flags, int cpu, s_time_t now) { struct sched_unit *next; @@ -2500,7 +2501,7 @@ static struct sched_unit *sched_wait_rendezvous_in(struct sched_unit *prev, prev->rendezvous_in_cnt++; atomic_set(&prev->rendezvous_out_cnt, 0);- pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(*lock, cpu);+ pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(*lock, *flags, cpu);sched_context_switch(vprev, v, false, now); @@ -2530,7 +2531,7 @@ static struct sched_unit *sched_wait_rendezvous_in(struct sched_unit *prev,prev->rendezvous_in_cnt++; atomic_set(&prev->rendezvous_out_cnt, 0);- pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(*lock, cpu);+ pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(*lock, *flags, cpu);raise_softirq(SCHED_SLAVE_SOFTIRQ);sched_context_switch(vprev, vprev, false, now); @@ -2538,11 +2539,11 @@ static struct sched_unit *sched_wait_rendezvous_in(struct sched_unit *prev, return NULL; /* ARM only. */ }- pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(*lock, cpu);+ pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(*lock, *flags, cpu);cpu_relax(); - *lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irq(cpu);+ *lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(cpu, flags);/** Check for scheduling resource switched. This happens when we are @@ -2557,7 +2558,7 @@ static struct sched_unit *sched_wait_rendezvous_in(struct sched_unit *prev, ASSERT(is_idle_unit(prev)); atomic_set(&prev->next_task->rendezvous_out_cnt, 0); prev->rendezvous_in_cnt = 0; - pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(*lock, cpu); + pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(*lock, *flags, cpu); rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock); return NULL; } @@ -2574,12 +2575,13 @@ static void sched_slave(void) spinlock_t *lock; bool do_softirq = false; unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + unsigned long flags;ASSERT_NOT_IN_ATOMIC(); rcu_read_lock(&sched_res_rculock); - lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irq(cpu);+ lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(cpu, &flags);now = NOW(); @@ -2590,7 +2592,7 @@ static void sched_slave(void) if ( v ){ - pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu); + pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags, cpu);sched_context_switch(vprev, v, false, now); @@ -2602,7 +2604,7 @@ static void sched_slave(void) if ( !prev->rendezvous_in_cnt ){ - pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu); + pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags, cpu);rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock); @@ -2615,11 +2617,11 @@ static void sched_slave(void) stop_timer(&get_sched_res(cpu)->s_timer); - next = sched_wait_rendezvous_in(prev, &lock, cpu, now);+ next = sched_wait_rendezvous_in(prev, &lock, &flags, cpu, now); if ( !next ) return;- pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu);+ pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags, cpu);sched_context_switch(vprev, sched_unit2vcpu_cpu(next, cpu),is_idle_unit(next) && !is_idle_unit(prev), now); @@ -2637,6 +2639,7 @@ static void schedule(void) s_time_t now; struct sched_resource *sr; spinlock_t *lock; + unsigned long flags; int cpu = smp_processor_id(); unsigned int gran;@@ -2646,7 +2649,7 @@ static void schedule(void) rcu_read_lock(&sched_res_rculock); - lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irq(cpu);+ lock = pcpu_schedule_lock_irqsave(cpu, &flags);sr = get_sched_res(cpu);gran = sr->granularity; @@ -2657,7 +2660,7 @@ static void schedule(void) * We have a race: sched_slave() should be called, so raise a softirq * in order to re-enter schedule() later and call sched_slave() now. */ - pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu); + pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags, cpu);rcu_read_unlock(&sched_res_rculock); @@ -2676,7 +2679,7 @@ static void schedule(void)prev->rendezvous_in_cnt = gran; cpumask_andnot(mask, sr->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu)); cpumask_raise_softirq(mask, SCHED_SLAVE_SOFTIRQ); - next = sched_wait_rendezvous_in(prev, &lock, cpu, now); + next = sched_wait_rendezvous_in(prev, &lock, &flags, cpu, now); if ( !next ) return; } @@ -2687,7 +2690,7 @@ static void schedule(void) atomic_set(&next->rendezvous_out_cnt, 0); }- pcpu_schedule_unlock_irq(lock, cpu);+ pcpu_schedule_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags, cpu);vnext = sched_unit2vcpu_cpu(next, cpu);sched_context_switch(vprev, vnext, Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |