[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2][4.15?] x86: fix build when NR_CPUS == 1
On 02.03.2021 11:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:59:37AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 01.03.2021 19:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:14:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 01.03.2021 15:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> In this case the compiler is recognizing that no valid array indexes >>>>>> remain (in x2apic_cluster()'s access to per_cpu(cpu_2_logical_apicid, >>>>>> ...)), but oddly enough isn't really consistent about the checking it >>>>>> does (see the code comment). >>>>> >>>>> I assume this is because of the underlying per_cpu access to >>>>> __per_cpu_offset using cpu as the index, in which case wouldn't it be >>>>> better to place the BUG_ON there? >>>> >>>> Not sure, to be honest. It seemed more logical to me to place it >>>> next to where the issue is. >>> >>> I'm not sure whether I would prefer to place it in per_cpu directly to >>> avoid similar issues popping up in other parts of the code in the >>> future? >> >> That's going to be a lot of BUG_ON(), and hence a lot of "ud2" >> instances. Not something I'm keen on having. The more that it's >> not the per_cpu() which triggers the warning, but separate >> conditionals allowing the compiler to deduce value ranges of >> variables. > > Right. I don't see much other way around this then. Did you check with > clang also? No, I didn't. But if anything it would require further additions, surely no less. > Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |