[PATCH 1/2][4.15?] x86/shadow: suppress "fast fault path" optimization when running virtualized

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

We can't make correctness of our own behavior dependent upon a
hypervisor underneath us correctly telling us the true physical address
with hardware uses. Without knowing this, we can't be certain reserved
bit faults can actually be observed. Therefore, besides evaluating the
number of address bits when deciding whether to use the optimization,
also check whether we're running virtualized ourselves.

Requested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/types.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/types.h
@@ -282,10 +282,16 @@ shadow_put_page_from_l1e(shadow_l1e_t sl
  *
  * This is only feasible for PAE and 64bit Xen: 32-bit non-PAE PTEs don't
  * have reserved bits that we can use for this.  And even there it can only
- * be used if the processor doesn't use all 52 address bits.
+ * be used if we can be certain the processor doesn't use all 52 address bits.
  */
 
 #define SH_L1E_MAGIC 0xffffffff00000001ULL
+
+static inline bool sh_have_pte_rsvd_bits(void)
+{
+    return paddr_bits < PADDR_BITS && !cpu_has_hypervisor;
+}
+
 static inline bool sh_l1e_is_magic(shadow_l1e_t sl1e)
 {
     return (sl1e.l1 & SH_L1E_MAGIC) == SH_L1E_MAGIC;
@@ -303,7 +309,7 @@ static inline shadow_l1e_t sh_l1e_gnp(vo
      * On systems with no reserved physical address bits we can't engage the
      * fast fault path.
      */
-    return paddr_bits < PADDR_BITS ? sh_l1e_gnp_raw()
+    return sh_have_pte_rsvd_bits() ? sh_l1e_gnp_raw()
                                    : shadow_l1e_empty();
 }
 
@@ -326,7 +332,7 @@ static inline shadow_l1e_t sh_l1e_mmio(g
 {
     unsigned long gfn_val = MASK_INSR(gfn_x(gfn), SH_L1E_MMIO_GFN_MASK);
 
-    if ( paddr_bits >= PADDR_BITS ||
+    if ( !sh_have_pte_rsvd_bits() ||
          gfn_x(gfn) != MASK_EXTR(gfn_val, SH_L1E_MMIO_GFN_MASK) )
         return shadow_l1e_empty();