[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH][4.15?] libxl/ACPI: add missing build dependency

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:34:01 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel\@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:34:07 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH][4.15?] libxl/ACPI: add missing build dependency"):
> Just like all other object files - wherever *.o is mentioned, *.opic
> also needs mentioning to yield consistent behavior. Otherwise make may
> decide to (re)build the object before recursion into $(ACPI_PATH)/ (to
> update $(DSDT_FILES-y) and ssdt_*.h) was actually finished.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH][4.15?] libxl/ACPI: add missing build dependency
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2][4.15?] x86/shadow: encode full GFN in magic MMIO entries
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2][4.15?] x86/shadow: suppress "fast fault path" optimization when running virtualized
Previous by thread: [PATCH][4.15?] libxl/ACPI: add missing build dependency
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][4.15?] libxl/ACPI: add missing build dependency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.