[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH v2 4/5] xen/arm: smmuv1: Add a stream map entry iterator
Backport commit d3097e39302083d58922a3d1032d7d59a63d263d "iommu/arm-smmu: Add a stream map entry iterator" from the Linux kernel. This patch is the preparatory work to fix the stream match conflict when two devices have the same stream-id. Original commit message: iommu/arm-smmu: Add a stream map entry iterator We iterate over the SMEs associated with a master config quite a lot in various places, and are about to do so even more. Let's wrap the idiom in a handy iterator macro before the repetition gets out of hand. Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> --- xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c index e1b937bd4b..2c1ea8e6ff 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c @@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg { s16 smendx[MAX_MASTER_STREAMIDS]; }; #define INVALID_SMENDX -1 +#define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) \ + for (i = 0; idx = cfg->smendx[i], i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) struct arm_smmu_master { struct device_node *of_node; @@ -1457,8 +1459,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int i, idx; /* Allocate the SMRs on the SMMU */ - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) { - if (cfg->smendx[i] != INVALID_SMENDX) + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) { + if (idx != INVALID_SMENDX) return -EEXIST; /* ...except on stream indexing hardware, of course */ @@ -1482,8 +1484,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, return 0; /* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */ - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) - arm_smmu_write_smr(smmu, cfg->smendx[i]); + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) + arm_smmu_write_smr(smmu, idx); return 0; @@ -1498,15 +1500,13 @@ err_free_smrs: static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg) { - int i; + int i, idx; /* * We *must* clear the S2CR first, because freeing the SMR means * that it can be re-allocated immediately. */ - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) { - int idx = cfg->smendx[i]; - + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) { /* An IOMMU group is torn down by the first device to be removed */ if (idx == INVALID_SMENDX) return; @@ -1518,9 +1518,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, __iowmb(); /* Invalidate the SMRs before freeing back to the allocator */ - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) { + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) { if (smmu->smrs) - arm_smmu_free_smr(smmu, cfg->smendx[i]); + arm_smmu_free_smr(smmu, idx); cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX; } @@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg) { - int i, ret = 0; + int i, idx, ret = 0; struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu; struct arm_smmu_s2cr *s2cr = smmu->s2crs; enum arm_smmu_s2cr_type type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS; @@ -1540,9 +1540,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, if (ret) return ret; - for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_streamids; ++i) { - int idx = cfg->smendx[i]; - + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) { /* Devices in an IOMMU group may already be configured */ if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx) break; -- 2.17.1
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |