[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] rangeset: no need to use snprintf()
Hi Jan, On 06/04/2021 09:50, Jan Beulich wrote: As of the conversion to safe_strcpy() years ago there has been no need anymore to use snprintf() to prevent storing a not-nul-terminated string. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/common/rangeset.c +++ b/xen/common/rangeset.c @@ -436,14 +436,7 @@ struct rangeset *rangeset_new( BUG_ON(flags & ~RANGESETF_prettyprint_hex); r->flags = flags;- if ( name != NULL )- { - safe_strcpy(r->name, name); - } - else - { - snprintf(r->name, sizeof(r->name), "(no name)"); - } + safe_strcpy(r->name, name ?: "(no name)"); I realize the current code is not checking the return, but I wonder we should rather than silently truncating the string. This is not a new issue, so it can dealt separately if we decide to check the return. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |