[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pci: Refactor PCI MSI interrupts related code


  • To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:28:44 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YipUttlAOFA2oUKXqGf7GbV9EnkRQ3SUSi+X7cnT3vI=; b=gbD8o7WWnYl/J7FvP0qN4BkIDvexkfn3J36JCu60Xp2DhSpBBNcxUcUYBudt1hZPxpwa9tQPdBKb2+AVuJzQqWB18IdiwKm5Ylk2iDu3tfyCndWtFZ+QnJzT0xh6wNb0NdJLMiKc+Quo1Y+nr/1IQ2f92jHljFYez3VfP7roh0wrYMeMleWxMdyAxurZrCtUoZU2VL2x9KF6KryXem+Hw8I1B/esOnUDA5C6qeva00QV1MuHW4D9Ou1eEdmf3UdDhSkABkgBbRTU4m52wlJQstRg9/Gf69SU9/6Huo3lC8/G8K5E1gN/GPUGPT4O0T3CLseFeEoCq0ebxVSTlQtXuQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lbTBf3vVcssF8NDrah3AgFJTYyq6QSqrm9PLEZ0RdfWbIK+2rlnRHSFsoCWVfxbMbpVmKeoW8BkMQPF5qpqWgqo1NIyvige9y3edOrTL9dgV+1ZU4zM4nLLTDLKCQUN4y3B0OzCjPmAzH1X4WSKALSyf9AXANtNPAycM8wJX8MzAPHZglxE0mNX+Q+noWghhe8nwcutdoKJESWuDX7ZQcHjUtXf/QFzYyGhlpQ9vk06PF9oUO9S4v8GOlEKrdTI91qcebyw3nZVS9n1hr+qwhTK8wNEQl09jtKnZ9KIa2GLFg1mZ2h0M6ejP8DkgjgMtAbB79ube84INvNO/EA2GqQ==
  • Authentication-results-original: citrix.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;citrix.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:29:02 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: citrix.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;citrix.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHXLVmJnBz/2T+xZEqfD4R39q2wV6qwuDwAgABe4AA=
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v2] xen/pci: Refactor PCI MSI interrupts related code

Hi Roger,

> On 12 Apr 2021, at 11:49 am, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> MSI related code in the "passthrough/pci.c” file is not useful for ARM
>> when MSI interrupts are injected via GICv3 ITS.
>> 
>> Therefore introducing the new flag CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT to gate the
>> MSI code for ARM in common code. Also move the arch-specific code to an
>> arch-specific directory and implement the stub version for the unused
>> code for ARM to avoid compilation error when HAS_PCI is enabled for ARM.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Rename CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI to CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>> - Implement stub version of the unused function for ARM.
>> - Move unneeded function to x86 file.     
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/msi.c            | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c | 51 +++++++---------------------
>> xen/drivers/pci/Kconfig       |  4 +++
>> xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile     |  3 +-
>> xen/drivers/vpci/header.c     | 19 +++--------
>> xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c       | 25 ++++++++++++++
>> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c       |  3 +-
>> xen/include/asm-arm/msi.h     | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/include/asm-x86/msi.h     |  4 +++
>> xen/include/xen/pci.h         | 11 +++---
>> xen/include/xen/vpci.h        | 24 ++++++++++++-
>> xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c         |  8 ++---
>> 12 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/msi.h
>> 
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> index 5febc0ea4b..a6356f4a63 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> @@ -1411,6 +1411,70 @@ void __init early_msi_init(void)
>>         return;
>> }
>> 
>> +int alloc_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
> I would rather name it pci_msi_init...
> 
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int pos;
>> +
>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->msi_list);
>> +
>> +    pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>> +                              PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
>> +    if ( pos )
>> +    {
>> +        uint16_t ctrl = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, msi_control_reg(pos));
>> +
>> +        pdev->msi_maxvec = multi_msi_capable(ctrl);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>> +                              PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>> +    if ( pos )
>> +    {
>> +        struct arch_msix *msix = xzalloc(struct arch_msix);
>> +        uint16_t ctrl;
>> +
>> +        if ( !msix )
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +        spin_lock_init(&msix->table_lock);
>> +
>> +        ctrl = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, msix_control_reg(pos));
>> +        msix->nr_entries = msix_table_size(ctrl);
>> +
>> +        pdev->msix = msix;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void free_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
> ...and pci_msi_free.

Ok. I will change the name in next version. 
> 
>> +{
>> +    xfree(pdev->msix);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int pci_assign_msix_init(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
> This kind of a confusing name - what about pci_msix_assign?

Ok.
> 
>> +{
>> +    int rc;
>> +
>> +    if ( pdev->msix )
>> +    {
>> +        rc = pci_reset_msix_state(pdev);
>> +        if ( rc )
>> +            return rc;
>> +        msixtbl_init(d);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void dump_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct msi_desc *msi;
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry ( msi, &pdev->msi_list, list )
>> +        printk("%d ", msi->irq);
>> +}
> 
> I wonder, those those function really want to be in a x86 specific
> file? There's nothing x86 specific about them AFAICT.
> 
> Would it make sense to create a separate msi-intercept.c file with
> those that gets included when CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT? 

Yes that will be fine to create the separate file msi-intercept.c.
> 
> 
>> static void dump_msi(unsigned char key)
>> {
>>     unsigned int irq;
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>> index 705137f8be..1b473502a1 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static struct pci_dev *alloc_pdev(struct pci_seg *pseg, 
>> u8 bus, u8 devfn)
>> {
>>     struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>     unsigned int pos;
>> +    int rc;
>> 
>>     list_for_each_entry ( pdev, &pseg->alldevs_list, alldevs_list )
>>         if ( pdev->bus == bus && pdev->devfn == devfn )
>> @@ -327,35 +328,12 @@ static struct pci_dev *alloc_pdev(struct pci_seg 
>> *pseg, u8 bus, u8 devfn)
>>     *((u8*) &pdev->bus) = bus;
>>     *((u8*) &pdev->devfn) = devfn;
>>     pdev->domain = NULL;
>> -    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->msi_list);
>> -
>> -    pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pseg->nr, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), 
>> PCI_FUNC(devfn),
>> -                              PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
>> -    if ( pos )
>> -    {
>> -        uint16_t ctrl = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, msi_control_reg(pos));
>> -
>> -        pdev->msi_maxvec = multi_msi_capable(ctrl);
>> -    }
>> 
>> -    pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pseg->nr, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), 
>> PCI_FUNC(devfn),
>> -                              PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>> -    if ( pos )
>> +    rc = alloc_pci_msi(pdev);
>> +    if ( rc )
>>     {
>> -        struct arch_msix *msix = xzalloc(struct arch_msix);
>> -        uint16_t ctrl;
>> -
>> -        if ( !msix )
>> -        {
>> -            xfree(pdev);
>> -            return NULL;
>> -        }
>> -        spin_lock_init(&msix->table_lock);
>> -
>> -        ctrl = pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, msix_control_reg(pos));
>> -        msix->nr_entries = msix_table_size(ctrl);
>> -
>> -        pdev->msix = msix;
>> +        xfree(pdev);
>> +        return NULL;
>>     }
>> 
>>     list_add(&pdev->alldevs_list, &pseg->alldevs_list);
>> @@ -449,7 +427,7 @@ static void free_pdev(struct pci_seg *pseg, struct 
>> pci_dev *pdev)
>>     }
>> 
>>     list_del(&pdev->alldevs_list);
>> -    xfree(pdev->msix);
>> +    free_pci_msi(pdev);
>>     xfree(pdev);
>> }
>> 
>> @@ -1271,7 +1249,6 @@ bool_t pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(const struct 
>> pci_dev *pdev)
>> static int _dump_pci_devices(struct pci_seg *pseg, void *arg)
>> {
>>     struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> -    struct msi_desc *msi;
>> 
>>     printk("==== segment %04x ====\n", pseg->nr);
>> 
>> @@ -1280,8 +1257,7 @@ static int _dump_pci_devices(struct pci_seg *pseg, 
>> void *arg)
>>         printk("%pp - %pd - node %-3d - MSIs < ",
>>                &pdev->sbdf, pdev->domain,
>>                (pdev->node != NUMA_NO_NODE) ? pdev->node : -1);
>> -        list_for_each_entry ( msi, &pdev->msi_list, list )
>> -               printk("%d ", msi->irq);
>> +        dump_pci_msi(pdev);
>>         printk(">\n");
>>     }
>> 
>> @@ -1303,12 +1279,15 @@ static int __init setup_dump_pcidevs(void)
>> }
>> __initcall(setup_dump_pcidevs);
>> 
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>> int iommu_update_ire_from_msi(
>>     struct msi_desc *msi_desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
>> {
>>     return iommu_intremap
>>            ? iommu_call(&iommu_ops, update_ire_from_msi, msi_desc, msg) : 0;
>> }
>> +#endif
> 
> This is not exactly related to MSI intercepts, the IOMMU interrupt
> remapping table will also be used for interrupt entries for devices
> being used by Xen directly, where no intercept is required.
> 
> And then you also want to gate the hook from iommu_ops itself with
> CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT, if we want to got this route.

Ok. Let me check this and come back to you.
> 
>> 
>> static int iommu_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -1429,13 +1408,9 @@ static int assign_device(struct domain *d, u16 seg, 
>> u8 bus, u8 devfn, u32 flag)
>>     ASSERT(pdev && (pdev->domain == hardware_domain ||
>>                     pdev->domain == dom_io));
>> 
>> -    if ( pdev->msix )
>> -    {
>> -        rc = pci_reset_msix_state(pdev);
>> -        if ( rc )
>> -            goto done;
>> -        msixtbl_init(d);
>> -    }
>> +    rc = pci_assign_msix_init(d, pdev);
>> +    if ( rc )
>> +        goto done;
>> 
>>     pdev->fault.count = 0;
>> 
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/xen/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> index 7da03fa13b..7ab92bde6e 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
>> 
>> config HAS_PCI
>>      bool
>> +
>> +config PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>> +    def_bool y
>> +    depends on X86 && HAS_PCI
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile b/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
>> index 55d1bdfda0..f91fa71a40 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>> -obj-y += vpci.o header.o msi.o msix.o
>> +obj-y += vpci.o header.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT) += msi.o msix.o
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>> index ba9a036202..a7695a0e2a 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>> @@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
>>     struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
>>     struct rangeset *mem = rangeset_new(NULL, NULL, 0);
>>     struct pci_dev *tmp, *dev = NULL;
>> -    const struct vpci_msix *msix = pdev->vpci->msix;
>>     unsigned int i;
>>     int rc;
>> 
>> @@ -244,21 +243,11 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
>>     }
>> 
>>     /* Remove any MSIX regions if present. */
>> -    for ( i = 0; msix && i < ARRAY_SIZE(msix->tables); i++ )
>> +    rc = remove_msix_regions(pdev,mem);
> 
> Coding style: missing space between parameters.

Ack.
> 
>> +    if ( rc )
>>     {
>> -        unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(vmsix_table_addr(pdev->vpci, i));
>> -        unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(vmsix_table_addr(pdev->vpci, i) +
>> -                                     vmsix_table_size(pdev->vpci, i) - 1);
>> -
>> -        rc = rangeset_remove_range(mem, start, end);
>> -        if ( rc )
>> -        {
>> -            printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
>> -                   "Failed to remove MSIX table [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
>> -                   start, end, rc);
>> -            rangeset_destroy(mem);
>> -            return rc;
>> -        }
>> +        rangeset_destroy(mem);
>> +        return rc;
>>     }
>> 
>>     /*
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
>> index 846f1b8d70..ca0a9b5665 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
>> @@ -428,6 +428,31 @@ int vpci_make_msix_hole(const struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>     return 0;
>> }
>> 
>> +int remove_msix_regions(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct rangeset *mem)
> 
> This needs to start with a vpci_ prefix, since it's a global function.
> What about vpci_msix_remove_regions.

Ok.
> 
>> +{
>> +    const struct vpci_msix *msix = pdev->vpci->msix;
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +    int rc;
>> +
>> +    for ( i = 0; msix && i < ARRAY_SIZE(msix->tables); i++ )
>> +    {
>> +        unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(vmsix_table_addr(pdev->vpci, i));
>> +        unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(vmsix_table_addr(pdev->vpci, i) +
>> +                vmsix_table_size(pdev->vpci, i) - 1);
>> +
>> +        rc = rangeset_remove_range(mem, start, end);
>> +        if ( rc )
>> +        {
>> +            printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
>> +                    "Failed to remove MSIX table [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
>> +                    start, end, rc);
>> +            return rc;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int init_msix(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>>     struct domain *d = pdev->domain;
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
>> index cbd1bac7fc..ebe40b0538 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
>> @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ void vpci_remove_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>         xfree(r);
>>     }
>>     spin_unlock(&pdev->vpci->lock);
>> -    xfree(pdev->vpci->msix);
>> -    xfree(pdev->vpci->msi);
>> +    free_vpci_msi(pdev);
>>     xfree(pdev->vpci);
>>     pdev->vpci = NULL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/msi.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/msi.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..c54193310e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/msi.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Arm Ltd.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASM_MSI_H_
>> +#define __ASM_MSI_H_
>> +
>> +static inline int alloc_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int pci_assign_msix_init(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev 
>> *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void dump_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev) {}
>> +static inline void free_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev) {}
>> +static inline void pci_cleanup_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev) {}
>> +
>> +#endif /* __ASM_MSI_H */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Local variables:
>> + * mode: C
>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>> + * tab-width: 4
>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>> + * End:
>> + */
> 
> Should you instead have a non-arch specific file with those dummy
> helpers that get used when !CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT?

Ok.
> 
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/msi.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/msi.h
>> index e228b0f3f3..7ef0161b67 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msi.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/msi.h
>> @@ -252,5 +252,9 @@ void unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_desc *);
>> void guest_mask_msi_irq(struct irq_desc *, bool mask);
>> void ack_nonmaskable_msi_irq(struct irq_desc *);
>> void set_msi_affinity(struct irq_desc *, const cpumask_t *);
>> +int alloc_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> +void free_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> +void dump_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> +int pci_assign_msix_init(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> 
>> #endif /* __ASM_MSI_H */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/pci.h b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
>> index 8e3d4d9454..f5b57270be 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
>> @@ -79,10 +79,6 @@ struct pci_dev {
>>     struct list_head alldevs_list;
>>     struct list_head domain_list;
>> 
>> -    struct list_head msi_list;
>> -
>> -    struct arch_msix *msix;
>> -
>>     struct domain *domain;
>> 
>>     const union {
>> @@ -94,7 +90,14 @@ struct pci_dev {
>>         pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
>>     };
>> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>> +    struct list_head msi_list;
>> +
>> +    struct arch_msix *msix;
>> +
>>     uint8_t msi_maxvec;
>> +#endif
>> +
>>     uint8_t phantom_stride;
>> 
>>     nodeid_t node; /* NUMA node */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
>> index 9f5b5d52e1..a6b12717b1 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
>> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct vpci {
>>         /* FIXME: currently there's no support for SR-IOV. */
>>     } header;
>> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>>     /* MSI data. */
>>     struct vpci_msi {
>>       /* Address. */
>> @@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ struct vpci {
>>             struct vpci_arch_msix_entry arch;
>>         } entries[];
>>     } *msix;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT */
> 
> Note that here you just remove two pointers from the struct, not that
> I'm opposed to it, but it's not that much space that's saved anyway.
> Ie: it might also be fine to just leave them as NULL unconditionally
> on Arm.

Ok.
> 
>> #endif
>> };
>> 
>> @@ -148,6 +150,7 @@ struct vpci_vcpu {
>> };
>> 
>> #ifdef __XEN__
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
>> void vpci_dump_msi(void);
>> 
>> /* Make sure there's a hole in the p2m for the MSIX mmio areas. */
>> @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ int __must_check vpci_msix_arch_disable_entry(struct 
>> vpci_msix_entry *entry,
>>                                               const struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> void vpci_msix_arch_init_entry(struct vpci_msix_entry *entry);
>> int vpci_msix_arch_print(const struct vpci_msix *msix);
>> -
>> +int remove_msix_regions(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct rangeset *mem);
>> /*
>>  * Helper functions to fetch MSIX related data. They are used by both the
>>  * emulated MSIX code and the BAR handlers.
>> @@ -208,6 +211,25 @@ static inline unsigned int vmsix_entry_nr(const struct 
>> vpci_msix *msix,
>> {
>>     return entry - msix->entries;
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline void free_vpci_msi(const struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
> vpci_msi_free please.

Ok.

I will modify the code as per your comments and will send next version of the 
patch.

Regards,
Rahul
> 
> Thanks, Roger.


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.