[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpuid: support LFENCE always serializing CPUID bit
On 14/04/2021 14:05, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/04/2021 13:57, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 14.04.2021 13:04, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >>> @@ -264,6 +265,38 @@ struct cpuid_policy >>> }; >>> uint32_t nc:8, :4, apic_id_size:4, :16; >>> uint32_t /* d */:32; >>> + >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000009. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000a - SVM rev and features. >>> */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000b. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000c. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000d. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000e. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000000f. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000010. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000011. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000012. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000013. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000014. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000015. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000016. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000017. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000018. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000019 - TLB 1GB Identifiers. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001a - Performance related >>> info. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001b - IBS feature >>> information. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001c. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001d - Cache properties. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001e - Extd APIC/Core/Node >>> IDs. */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x8000001f - AMD Secure Encryption. >>> */ >>> + uint64_t :64, :64; /* Leaf 0x80000020 - Platform QoS. */ >>> + >>> + /* Leaf 0x80000021 - Extended Feature 2 */ >>> + union { >>> + uint32_t e21a; >>> + struct { DECL_BITFIELD(e21a); }; >>> + }; >>> + uint32_t /* b */:32, /* c */:32, /* d */:32; >>> }; >>> } extd; >> Due to the effect of this on what guests get to see, I think this >> wants to take my "x86/CPUID: shrink max_{,sub}leaf fields according >> to actual leaf contents" as a prereq, which in turn may better >> remain on top of "x86/CPUID: adjust extended leaves out of range >> clearing" (both are neighbors in that over 4 months old series, >> fair parts of which could imo go in irrespective of the unsettled >> dispute on xvmalloc() - unfortunately I had made that patch 2 of >> the series, not expecting it to be blocked for so long, and then >> presumably signaling to others that the rest of the series is also >> blocked). > There is no shrinking to be done in this case. The bit is set across > the board on AMD/Hygon hardware, even on older parts. > > What does need changing however is the logic to trim max_extd_leaf down > to what hardware supports, so the bit is visible on Rome/older > hardware. I.e. after this change, all VMs should get 0x80000021 by > default on AMD hardware. > > (A curious observation of Milan hardware is that it actually advertises > 0x80000023 as max_extd_leaf, and has two leaves of zeros at the end. > I've got an open query about this.) Something like this: diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c index 050cd5713e..d9eb2878c5 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static void __init calculate_raw_policy(void) static void __init calculate_host_policy(void) { struct cpuid_policy *p = &host_cpuid_policy; + unsigned int max_extd_leaf; *p = raw_cpuid_policy; @@ -318,7 +319,18 @@ static void __init calculate_host_policy(void) min_t(uint32_t, p->basic.max_leaf, ARRAY_SIZE(p->basic.raw) - 1); p->feat.max_subleaf = min_t(uint32_t, p->feat.max_subleaf, ARRAY_SIZE(p->feat.raw) - 1); - p->extd.max_leaf = 0x80000000 | min_t(uint32_t, p->extd.max_leaf & 0xffff, + + max_extd_leaf = p->extd.max_leaf; + + /* + * For AMD/Hygon hardware before Zen3, we modify LFENCE to be dispatch + * serialsing. Extend max_extd_leaf beyond what hardware supports, to + * include the feature leaf containing this information. + */ + if ( cpu_has_lfence_dispatch ) + max_extd_leaf = max(max_extd_leaf, 0x80000021); + + p->extd.max_leaf = 0x80000000 | min_t(uint32_t, max_extd_leaf & 0xffff, ARRAY_SIZE(p->extd.raw) - 1); cpuid_featureset_to_policy(boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, p); Only compile tested. Needs checking on Zen2 or older. The Raw policy should have the real max_extd_leaf, while host and derived should have 0x80000021. ~Andrew
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |