[PATCH v2 5/8] EFI/runtime: avoid effectively open-coding x{m,z}alloc_array()

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

There is a difference in generated code: x{m,z}alloc_bytes() forces
SMP_CACHE_BYTES alignment. But if code really cared about such higher
than default alignment, it should request so explicitly rather than
using a type-unsafe interface. And if e.g. cache line sharing was a
concern, the allocator itself should arrange to avoid such.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
+++ b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ int efi_runtime_call(struct xenpf_efi_ru
         size = op->u.get_variable.size;
         if ( size )
         {
-            data = xmalloc_bytes(size);
+            data = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, size);
             if ( !data )
             {
                 xfree(name);
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ int efi_runtime_call(struct xenpf_efi_ru
             return -EIO;
         }
 
-        data = xmalloc_bytes(op->u.set_variable.size);
+        data = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, op->u.set_variable.size);
         if ( !data )
             rc = -ENOMEM;
         else if ( copy_from_guest(data, op->u.set_variable.data,
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ int efi_runtime_call(struct xenpf_efi_ru
             return -EINVAL;
 
         size = op->u.get_next_variable_name.size;
-        name.raw = xzalloc_bytes(size);
+        name.raw = xzalloc_array(unsigned char, size);
         if ( !name.raw )
             return -ENOMEM;
         if ( copy_from_guest(name.raw, op->u.get_next_variable_name.name,