[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: correct comment about alternatives ordering
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:19:11 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=uLUd233mBG+Fxusj6Unmqf25KWhNUEn6J+kWJNxNvnE=; b=ct6mlNU/80axlN0gssutBp0PzR8RuvWaavWzwfc7M0CaqcQcqWO9vQyt3spXoM/6YtDpCkPMTECVdr8AUH+hWszRZLU2lZZeww8OnL7NjwXH1bwHjGlOZw7W4cEEKoiU3hfxNgIafpXKm5+OVIHs6RiCMZW5NGPcHbNZVRrndQAUwdd4vAwAA6y0D7RvN+l3tgreufKrKw6YZ0ZvAH31PrJoMhMGDWY2nhfxZvffHMQKodMmc93UD5fNsY8EG6y03A3ysDeEzrVer2nue193WFzx97t1hy4u+1xFFzdTWftqDq2nczIQnLMN4BNbrLfzAvTAfavwQzQ9zwUrkYUzYQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GN+gth6KhphB4YNH1tYdRwOLcugsFdn8yLJfGto6rionXuvfCsALdPnJx7PHaHWlE/vP7WwyUXh9eOhLjvxT6iryTEN8GxzDqbmejrUTPGJJ+vEY16IbUO031sRZvH7jhY4+vtMJJIKVjcyCASyyPvUEWcVXOdPUhOpMdIkV9X+vomcUPHct//Jcilc96uKk8C4kthCfc8LswRj8mKVul39J4h7s7p5d89e4oHQfhlfg4WcSk4SP84dNcvsNMwC+Zml5+EHyLpmrQQgEHGRL0kYmPa9/LT3novFWdZKiJ8f3aBVIz9AJ/sKoOS862c3bXZ67rIPRk7lIqs5G+bGQNA==
- Authentication-results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@citrix.onmicrosoft.com
- Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:19:26 +0000
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:hiTniqv3yYOZw2ZA+p9hSD6s7skCB4Mji2hD6mlwRA09T+Wxnc qjhele8BfyhioYVn1Io6HlBICrR3TA+ZlppawYOrm/VAfr0VHYS71Kx43k3jHmBmnC5vdQvJ 0QCJRWJdXsATFB7frSzxK/F78breWv0KftvuvGymcocAcCUdAE0y5cKiK2VnJ7XxNHA51RLu vn2uNiqyC7cXoaKuSXb0N1PNTrnNHAmJL4bRNuPXdOg2OzpAil57LgHx+T0g12aUIs/Z4Z7W PHnwblj5/Nj9iHywTR32KWz5NalMqJ8Lp+LfGMkcQcJ3HQjB+pbu1aNYGqgTZdmo2SwWdvtO OJgh87e+xv9nvafwiO0H3Q8jil9Axr1ljP5huzh2D5rcnwWTQgYvAx/L5xY1/e8EovvNZ1za JN0SaYrvNsfGv9oBg=
- Ironport-sdr: xA+Z6CCxRfCk3vZec/6D9OT+IP636IA7xA4aetobkVGhZ1XPqdqYsiy1fpuafObiYd/vG3LeMN Qohy1xsIA6JgaXFIemkiEC8uT80rOTJZLyEIPQOSPv/lp3rJVcOmMcf/eiRC7/k67/SN/VuWa5 abk4xIfW4P9BKSUsbevwbyK1NEOskqrlM95f6HEA8DglimdQZR7se4N85f0RccDKtKiBjOwHn/ IxyLFv/iomn0TJwDNgk40br9PJbdQ6UsHBOtNISRdB2z1yJB84n0cf/YHamBeUzI+1TzYHpUwh ozY=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 27/04/2021 13:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Unlike Linux, Xen has never (so far) used alternatives patching for
> memcpy() or memset(), even less such utilizing multiple alternatives.
> Correct the Linux-inherited comment to match reality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
