Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 161776: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 161776: regressions - FAIL"):
> I did consider this as an option, but I don't think it's this simple.
> Neither 4.11 and older nor 4.13 and newer exhibit such behavior. In
> fact in 4.12 we appear to see pushes blocked now because there was a
> success of this test once, in flight 159418. So while this may not
> be a regression within 4.12 (and hence a force push may still be an
> appropriate step), there is something wrong there with 4.12, I would
> say. It being out of (general) support may of course mean we want to
> leave it at that. Better, for the remaining time the branch is in
> security-only maintenance state, would of course be to identify the
> (presumably) missing backport ... Of course that's easy to say for
> me, because I don't think I would realistically be the one to
> undertake such an exercise.

Hrm.  For now I have force pushed it as I suggested.

Ian.