[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 05/10] xen/arm: introduce alloc_staticmem_pages
Hi Penny, On 18/05/2021 06:21, Penny Zheng wrote: alloc_staticmem_pages is designated to allocate nr_pfns contiguous pages of static memory. And it is the equivalent of alloc_heap_pages for static memory. This commit only covers allocating at specified starting address. For each page, it shall check if the page is reserved (PGC_reserved) and free. It shall also do a set of necessary initialization, which are mostly the same ones in alloc_heap_pages, like, following the same cache-coherency policy and turning page status into PGC_state_used, etc. Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx> --- xen/common/page_alloc.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c index 58b53c6ac2..adf2889e76 100644 --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c @@ -1068,6 +1068,70 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_pages( return pg; }+/*+ * Allocate nr_pfns contiguous pages, starting at #start, of static memory. + * It is the equivalent of alloc_heap_pages for static memory + */ +static struct page_info *alloc_staticmem_pages(unsigned long nr_pfns, This wants to be nr_mfns. + paddr_t start, I would prefer if this helper takes an mfn_t in parameter. + unsigned int memflags) +{ + bool need_tlbflush = false; + uint32_t tlbflush_timestamp = 0; + unsigned int i; + struct page_info *pg; + mfn_t s_mfn; + + /* For now, it only supports allocating at specified address. */ + s_mfn = maddr_to_mfn(start); + pg = mfn_to_page(s_mfn); We should avoid to make the assumption the start address will be valid. So you want to call mfn_valid() first. At the same time, there is no guarantee that if the first page is valid, then the next nr_pfns will be. So the check should be performed for all of them. + if ( !pg ) + return NULL; + + for ( i = 0; i < nr_pfns; i++) + { + /* + * Reference count must continuously be zero for free pages + * of static memory(PGC_reserved). + */ + ASSERT(pg[i].count_info & PGC_reserved); + if ( (pg[i].count_info & ~PGC_reserved) != PGC_state_free ) + { + printk(XENLOG_ERR + "Reference count must continuously be zero for free pages" + "pg[%u] MFN %"PRI_mfn" c=%#lx t=%#x\n", + i, mfn_x(page_to_mfn(pg + i)), + pg[i].count_info, pg[i].tlbflush_timestamp); + BUG(); So we would crash Xen if the caller pass a wrong range. Is it what we want? Also, who is going to prevent concurrent access? + } + + if ( !(memflags & MEMF_no_tlbflush) ) + accumulate_tlbflush(&need_tlbflush, &pg[i], + &tlbflush_timestamp); + + /* + * Reserve flag PGC_reserved and change page state + * to PGC_state_inuse. + */ + pg[i].count_info = (pg[i].count_info & PGC_reserved) | PGC_state_inuse; + /* Initialise fields which have other uses for free pages. */ + pg[i].u.inuse.type_info = 0; + page_set_owner(&pg[i], NULL); + + /* + * Ensure cache and RAM are consistent for platforms where the + * guest can control its own visibility of/through the cache. + */ + flush_page_to_ram(mfn_x(page_to_mfn(&pg[i])), + !(memflags & MEMF_no_icache_flush)); + } + + if ( need_tlbflush ) + filtered_flush_tlb_mask(tlbflush_timestamp); + + return pg; +} + /* Remove any offlined page in the buddy pointed to by head. */ static int reserve_offlined_page(struct page_info *head) { Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |