[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v7 14/15] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 08:48:59PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:35 PM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:29:20PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:53 PM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 01:13:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:42:14PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > > > > > > @@ -138,4 +160,9 @@ one for multimedia processing (named > > > > > > multimedia-memory@77000000, 64MiB). > > > > > > memory-region = <&multimedia_reserved>; > > > > > > /* ... */ > > > > > > }; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + pcie_device: pcie_device@0,0 { > > > > > > + memory-region = <&restricted_dma_mem_reserved>; > > > > > > + /* ... */ > > > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > > > I still don't understand how this works for individual PCIe devices > > > > > -- how > > > > > is dev->of_node set to point at the node you have above? > > > > > > > > > > I tried adding the memory-region to the host controller instead, and > > > > > then > > > > > I see it crop up in dmesg: > > > > > > > > > > | pci-host-generic 40000000.pci: assigned reserved memory node > > > > > restricted_dma_mem_reserved > > > > > > > > > > but none of the actual PCI devices end up with 'dma_io_tlb_mem' set, > > > > > and > > > > > so the restricted DMA area is not used. In fact, swiotlb isn't used > > > > > at all. > > > > > > > > > > What am I missing to make this work with PCIe devices? > > > > > > > > Aha, looks like we're just missing the logic to inherit the DMA > > > > configuration. The diff below gets things working for me. > > > > > > I guess what was missing is the reg property in the pcie_device node. > > > Will update the example dts. > > > > Thanks. I still think something like my diff makes sense, if you wouldn't > > mind including > > it, as it allows restricted DMA to be used for situations where the PCIe > > topology is not static. > > > > Perhaps we should prefer dev->of_node if it exists, but then use the node > > of the host bridge's parent node otherwise? > > Sure. Let me add in the next version. Brill, thanks! I'll take it for a spin once it lands on the list. Will
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |