[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:43 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:55:20PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > > Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and > > use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be > > useful later to allow for different pools. > > > > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch as commit af452ec1b1a3 ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce > for swiotlb data bouncing") causes my Ryzen 3 4300G system to fail to > get to an X session consistently (although not every single time), > presumably due to a crash in the AMDGPU driver that I see in dmesg. > > I have attached logs at af452ec1b1a3 and f127c9556a8e and I am happy > to provide any further information, debug, or test patches as necessary. Are you using swiotlb=force? or the swiotlb_map is called because of !dma_capable? (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/kernel/dma/direct.h#n93) `BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000003a8290` and the fact it crashed at `_raw_spin_lock_irqsave` look like the memory (maybe dev->dma_io_tlb_mem) was corrupted? The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem should be set here (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/pci/probe.c#n2528) through device_initialize. I can't tell what happened from the logs, but maybe we could try KASAN to see if it provides more clue. Thanks, Claire > > Cheers, > Nathan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |