Re: [PATCH v1 00/16] .map_sg() error cleanup

[Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2021-07-15 10:53 a.m., Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:45:28AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series is spun out and expanded from my work to add P2PDMA support
>> to DMA map operations[1].
>>
>> The P2PDMA work requires distinguishing different error conditions in
>> a map_sg operation. dma_map_sgtable() already allows for returning an
>> error code (where as dma_map_sg() is only allowed to return zero)
>> however, it currently only returns -EINVAL when a .map_sg() call returns
>> zero.
>>
>> This series cleans up all .map_sg() implementations to return appropriate
>> error codes. After the cleanup, dma_map_sg() will still return zero,
>> however dma_map_sgtable() will pass the error code from the .map_sg()
>> call. Thanks go to Martn Oliveira for doing a lot of the cleanup of the
>> obscure implementations.
>>
>> The patch set is based off of v5.14-rc1 and a git repo can be found
>> here:
> 
> Have all the callers for dma_map_sg() been updated to check for error
> codes? If not, isn't that a pre-requisit to this patch set?

No. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough: This series is changing only
impelemntations of .map_sg(). It does *not* change the return code of
dma_map_sg(). dma_map_sg() will continue to return zero on error for the
foreseeable future. The dma_map_sgtable() call already allows returning
error codes and it will pass the new error code through. This is what
will be used in the P2PDMA work.

Logan