[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] xen/sched: fix get_cpu_idle_time() for smt=0 suspend/resume
On 18.08.21 12:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.08.2021 12:21, Juergen Gross wrote:With smt=0 during a suspend/resume cycle of the machine the threads which have been parked before will briefly come up again. This can result in problems e.g. with cpufreq driver being active as this will call into get_cpu_idle_time() for a cpu without initialized scheduler data. Fix that by letting get_cpu_idle_time() deal with this case. Fixes: 132cbe8f35632fb2 ("sched: fix get_cpu_idle_time() with core scheduling") Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>--- a/xen/common/sched/core.c +++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ uint64_t get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu) struct vcpu_runstate_info state = { 0 }; const struct vcpu *v = idle_vcpu[cpu];- if ( cpu_online(cpu) && v )+ if ( cpu_online(cpu) && v && get_sched_res(cpu) ) vcpu_runstate_get(v, &state);My earlier question was aiming at getting rid of the (now) middle part of the condition; I thought this may be okay to do as a secondary change here. But perhaps you intentionally left it there, so I'm unsure whether to suggest to make the adjustment while committing (awaiting a maintainer ack first anyway). Ah, okay. Yes, I think the test of v being non-NULL can be removed. Juergen Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |