[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 9/9] gnttab: don't silently truncate GFNs in compat setup-table handling
- To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:15:10 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=e6HedQ272Hp//43TliKGHrhoJiCNzxfthP7GUPhT9cI=; b=lE3XO7F1fhUqoqh+3Y2exirEf7TBwopQeW9D5Uozc9psnj6C+FkgjoNwBMKoS2H09Vzy3svN8UD5c3pGSBPBoIB4Rj51HDOF8jtXGm6EHngv97z9KoSJa0EFDtJsB2ZHTKklLrnGYsGeDG9s0nI+ZQI5UJT4LZYaazA2SF7Z7cbcwr+QMcAPmgxr/z389LSfCAZ0yrwdhtV9wWzvFBGR0mKk/Ge3oaeqsmtnsTokntJp5eKSDxD2dI+gd7y2GKUlyAnLo++1JT/aTZFcvUuR39JAtSwUh55OXsG7NiAOavc+4EecD5DVXdKZAIp/tl6sZ3e+m2AqUdSVyLfRt9hQyA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BSvH8K7oUPfe1XTevN+tJ9r4CogZ2pTHeJgVGZqy9Xr8XWcJUDZZa8MFtRL8IcGDFYVJiWk01tZKMJ8FpsLpK4c4Cr1CBpyn5tZfb3fg4kYcUyfA8qlF6rJ9Ied6UgUXpo1LMDLAf9w76ZQGTwygfzfth3n5b+E0C4AeQ6UWqftgLuHIFis8Hs4VyGtUG2neuDy6AGD1SUe3/BM3k/Aqf4XcdxF/dc59GfB4bGh0MFI/b+ACqvpJTHwxKzLe3yY2HLOBN+RviYxnWCmNLg8hpNjJwDZdAb6kpqokTdnoOY6g8sHTjZV2KhYiypnJ+SqEnDTvIOw1Oq/knIWkbWZZqA==
- Authentication-results: xen.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;xen.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:15:19 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Returning back truncated frame numbers is unhelpful: Quite likely
they're not owned by the domain (if it's PV), or we may misguide the
guest into writing grant entries into a page that it actually uses for
other purposes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
RFC: Arguably in the 32-bit PV case it may be necessary to instead put
in place an explicit address restriction when allocating
->shared_raw[N]. This is currently implicit by alloc_xenheap_page()
only returning memory covered by the direct-map.
--- a/xen/common/compat/grant_table.c
+++ b/xen/common/compat/grant_table.c
@@ -175,8 +175,15 @@ int compat_grant_table_op(unsigned int c
i < (_s_)->nr_frames; ++i ) \
{ \
compat_pfn_t frame = (_s_)->frame_list.p[i]; \
- if ( __copy_to_compat_offset((_d_)->frame_list, \
- i, &frame, 1) ) \
+ if ( frame != (_s_)->frame_list.p[i] ) \
+ { \
+ if ( VALID_M2P((_s_)->frame_list.p[i]) ) \
+ (_s_)->status = GNTST_address_too_big; \
+ else \
+ frame |= 0x80000000U;\
+ } \
+ else if ( __copy_to_compat_offset((_d_)->frame_list, \
+ i, &frame, 1) ) \
(_s_)->status = GNTST_bad_virt_addr; \
} \
} while (0)
|