[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] xen/arm: introduce new helper device_tree_get_meminfo
Hi Penny, On 24/08/2021 10:50, Penny Zheng wrote: A few functions iterate over the device tree property to get memory info, like "reg" or the later "xen,static-mem", so this commit creates a new helper device_tree_get_meminfo to extract the common codes. The commit message needs to be updated as the patch has been reshuffled. Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c index 476e32e0f5..8c81be3379 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c @@ -63,6 +63,44 @@ void __init device_tree_get_reg(const __be32 **cell, u32 address_cells, *size = dt_next_cell(size_cells, cell); }+static int __init device_tree_get_meminfo(const void *fdt, int node,+ const char *prop_name, + u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells, + void *data) +{ + const struct fdt_property *prop; + unsigned int i, banks; + const __be32 *cell; + u32 reg_cells = address_cells + size_cells; + paddr_t start, size; + struct meminfo *mem = data; + + prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, prop_name, NULL); + if ( !prop ) + return -ENOENT; + + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data; + banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32)); + + for ( i = 0; i < banks && mem->nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ ) + { + device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, &start, &size); + /* Some DT may describe empty bank, ignore them */ + if ( !size ) + continue; + mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].start = start; + mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].size = size; + mem->nr_banks++; + } + + if ( i < banks ) + { + printk("Warning: Max number of supported memory regions reached.\n"); + return -ENOSPC; + } + return 0; +} + u32 __init device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node, const char *prop_name, u32 dflt) { @@ -139,14 +177,6 @@ static int __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt, int node, u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells, void *data) { - const struct fdt_property *prop; - int i; - int banks; - const __be32 *cell; - paddr_t start, size; - u32 reg_cells = address_cells + size_cells; - struct meminfo *mem = data; - if ( address_cells < 1 || size_cells < 1 ) This check will be the same for "xen,static-mem". So can it be moved to device_tree_get_meminfo()? { printk("fdt: node `%s': invalid #address-cells or #size-cells", @@ -154,27 +184,7 @@ static int __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt, int node, return -EINVAL; }- prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "reg", NULL);- if ( !prop ) - return -ENOENT; - - cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data; - banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32)); - - for ( i = 0; i < banks && mem->nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ ) - { - device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, &start, &size); - /* Some DT may describe empty bank, ignore them */ - if ( !size ) - continue; - mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].start = start; - mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].size = size; - mem->nr_banks++; - } - - if ( i < banks ) - return -ENOSPC; - return 0; + return device_tree_get_meminfo(fdt, node, "reg", address_cells, size_cells, data); }static int __init process_reserved_memory_node(const void *fdt, int node, Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |