[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm64: Remove vreg_emulate_sysreg32
Hi Michal, On 29/07/2021 11:42, Michal Orzel wrote: According to ARMv8A architecture, AArch64 registers are 64bit wide even though in many cases the upper 32bit is reserved. Therefore there is no need for function vreg_emulate_sysreg32 on arm64. This means that we can have just one function vreg_emulate_sysreg using new function pointer: typedef bool (*vreg_reg_fn_t)(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r, bool read); Modify vreg_emulate_cp32 to use the new function pointer as well. This change allows to properly use 64bit registers in AArch64 state and in case of AArch32 the upper 32 bits of AArch64 registers are inaccessible and are ignored(D1.20.1 ARM DDI 0487A.j). Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/arm64/vsysreg.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c | 16 ++++++++++---- xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c | 11 +++++----- xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 4 ++-- xen/include/asm-arm/vreg.h | 38 ++++++--------------------------- 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vsysreg.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vsysreg.c index caf17174b8..73fa2ca9ae 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vsysreg.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vsysreg.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ TVM_REG(CONTEXTIDR_EL1) { \ bool res; \ \ - res = vreg_emulate_sysreg64(regs, hsr, vreg_emulate_##reg); \ + res = vreg_emulate_sysreg(regs, hsr, vreg_emulate_##reg); \ ASSERT(res); \ break; \ } diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c b/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c index e3ce56d875..be1ec08159 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vcpreg.c @@ -57,9 +57,17 @@ #define WRITE_SYSREG_SZ(sz, val, sysreg...) WRITE_SYSREG##sz(val, sysreg) #endif+/*+ * type32_t is defined as register_t due to the vreg_emulate_cp32 and + * vreg_emulate_sysreg taking function pointer with register_t type used for + * passing register's value. + */ +typedef register_t type32_t; +typedef uint64_t type64_t ; NIT: spurious space before ;. I would suggest to mention in the commit message why this is necessary. AFAICT, it is not strictly necessary because you left ctl defined as a uin32_t. So I am guessing you only keep it for hardening purpose?+ /* The name is passed from the upper macro to workaround macro expansion. */ #define TVM_REG(sz, func, reg...) \ -static bool func(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint##sz##_t *r, bool read) \ +static bool func(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, type##sz##_t *r, bool read) \ { \ struct vcpu *v = current; \ bool cache_enabled = vcpu_has_cache_enabled(v); \ @@ -83,7 +91,7 @@ static bool func(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint##sz##_t *r, bool read) \#else /* CONFIG_ARM_64 */#define TVM_REG32_COMBINED(lowreg, hireg, xreg) \ -static bool vreg_emulate_##xreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, \ +static bool vreg_emulate_##xreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r, \ bool read, bool hi) \ { \ struct vcpu *v = current; \ @@ -108,13 +116,13 @@ static bool vreg_emulate_##xreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, \ return true; \ } \ \ -static bool vreg_emulate_##lowreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, \ +static bool vreg_emulate_##lowreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r,\ bool read) \ { \ return vreg_emulate_##xreg(regs, r, read, false); \ } \ \ -static bool vreg_emulate_##hireg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, \ +static bool vreg_emulate_##hireg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r, \ bool read) \ { \ return vreg_emulate_##xreg(regs, r, read, true); \ diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c index 613f37abab..cb5a70c42e 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c @@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static bool vgic_v3_emulate_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, union hsr hsr) switch ( hsr.bits & HSR_SYSREG_REGS_MASK ) { case HSR_SYSREG_ICC_SGI1R_EL1: - return vreg_emulate_sysreg64(regs, hsr, vgic_v3_emulate_sgi1r); + return vreg_emulate_sysreg(regs, hsr, vgic_v3_emulate_sgi1r);default:return false; diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c index 167fc6127a..0196951af4 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ void virt_timer_restore(struct vcpu *v) WRITE_SYSREG(v->arch.virt_timer.ctl, CNTV_CTL_EL0); }-static bool vtimer_cntp_ctl(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, bool read)+static bool vtimer_cntp_ctl(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r, + bool read) { struct vcpu *v = current; s_time_t expires; @@ -197,7 +198,7 @@ static bool vtimer_cntp_ctl(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, bool read) return true; }-static bool vtimer_cntp_tval(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r,+static bool vtimer_cntp_tval(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, register_t *r, bool read) { struct vcpu *v = current; @@ -316,11 +317,11 @@ static bool vtimer_emulate_sysreg(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, union hsr hsr) switch ( hsr.bits & HSR_SYSREG_REGS_MASK ) { case HSR_SYSREG_CNTP_CTL_EL0: - return vreg_emulate_sysreg32(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_ctl); + return vreg_emulate_sysreg(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_ctl); case HSR_SYSREG_CNTP_TVAL_EL0: - return vreg_emulate_sysreg32(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_tval); + return vreg_emulate_sysreg(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_tval); case HSR_SYSREG_CNTP_CVAL_EL0: - return vreg_emulate_sysreg64(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_cval); + return vreg_emulate_sysreg(regs, hsr, vtimer_cntp_cval);default:return false; diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h index 2577e9a244..2058b69447 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h @@ -484,9 +484,9 @@ extern register_t __cpu_logical_map[]; #define CNTKCTL_EL1_EL0PTEN (1u<<9) /* Expose phys timer registers to EL0 *//* Timer control registers */-#define CNTx_CTL_ENABLE (1u<<0) /* Enable timer */ +#define CNTx_CTL_ENABLE (1ul<<0) /* Enable timer */ #define CNTx_CTL_MASK (1ul<<1) /* Mask IRQ */ -#define CNTx_CTL_PENDING (1u<<2) /* IRQ pending */ +#define CNTx_CTL_PENDING (1ul<<2) /* IRQ pending */ If so how about adding:"Take the opportunity to switch CNTx_CTL_* to use UL to avoid any surprise with the negation of any bits (as used in vtimer_cntp_ctl)". The rest of the patch looks fine. So I would be happy to deal with the fixes on commit: Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |