[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v1 06/14] xen/arm: Add support for PCI ecam operations
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Rahul Singh wrote: > Add support for PCI ecam operations to access the PCI > configuration space. > > Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/arm/pci/Makefile | 1 + > xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-access.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 13 +++++- > xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-generic.c | 8 +++- > xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 32 +++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/pci/Makefile > index f3d97f859e..6f32fbbe67 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/Makefile > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/Makefile > @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ obj-y += pci.o > obj-y += pci-access.o > obj-y += pci-host-generic.o > obj-y += pci-host-common.o > +obj-y += ecam.o > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..91c691b41f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Arm Ltd. > + * > + * Based on Linux drivers/pci/ecam.c > + * Copyright 2016 Broadcom > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + */ > + > +#include <xen/pci.h> > +#include <xen/sched.h> > + > +/* > + * Function to implement the pci_ops ->map_bus method. > + */ > +void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, > + uint32_t sbdf, uint32_t where) Code style: alignment > +{ > + const struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->sysdata; > + unsigned int devfn_shift = cfg->ops->bus_shift - 8; Is it a guarantee that devfn_shift == bus_shift - 8, or is it just so for ECAM? > + void __iomem *base; > + > + pci_sbdf_t sbdf_t = (pci_sbdf_t) sbdf ; > + unsigned int busn = sbdf_t.bus; > + > + if ( busn < cfg->busn_start || busn > cfg->busn_end ) Genuine question: should it be busn >= cfg->busn_end ? I don't know if the range includes busn_end or not. > + return NULL; > + > + busn -= cfg->busn_start; > + base = cfg->win + (busn << cfg->ops->bus_shift); > + > + return base + (PCI_DEVFN(sbdf_t.dev, sbdf_t.fn) << devfn_shift) + where; > +} I understand that the arm32 part is not implemented and not part of this series, that's fine. However if the plan is that arm32 will dynamically map each bus individually, then I imagine this function will have an ioremap in the arm32 version. Which means that we also need an unmap_bus call in struct pci_ops. I understand that pci_ecam_unmap_bus would be a NOP today for arm64, but I think it makes sense to have it if we want the API to be generic. > +/* ECAM ops */ > +const struct pci_ecam_ops pci_generic_ecam_ops = { > + .bus_shift = 20, > + .pci_ops = { > + .map_bus = pci_ecam_map_bus, > + .read = pci_generic_config_read, > + .write = pci_generic_config_write, > + } > +}; > + > +/* > + * Local variables: > + * mode: C > + * c-file-style: "BSD" > + * c-basic-offset: 4 > + * tab-width: 4 > + * indent-tabs-mode: nil > + * End: > + */ > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-access.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-access.c > index b938047c03..f39f6a3a38 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-access.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-access.c > @@ -15,6 +15,59 @@ > */ > > #include <xen/pci.h> > +#include <asm/io.h> > + > +int pci_generic_config_read(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t *value) > +{ > + void __iomem *addr = bridge->ops->map_bus(bridge, sbdf, reg); > + if (!addr) { > + *value = ~0; Is this a standard error? If so, I think we should define it with a macro (e.g. INVALID_PADDR). > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + switch (len) > + { > + case 1: > + *value = readb(addr); > + break; > + case 2: > + *value = readw(addr); > + break; > + case 4: > + *value = readl(addr); > + break; > + default: > + BUG(); A BUG here is harsh because it could be potentially guest-triggered. An ASSERT would be better. > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pci_generic_config_write(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t value) > +{ > + void __iomem *addr = bridge->ops->map_bus(bridge, sbdf, reg); > + if (!addr) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + switch (len) > + { > + case 1: > + writeb(value, addr); > + break; > + case 2: > + writew(value, addr); > + break; > + case 4: > + writel(value, addr); > + break; > + default: > + BUG(); Same here > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > > static uint32_t pci_config_read(pci_sbdf_t sbdf, unsigned int reg, > unsigned int len) > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > index 9dd9b02271..c582527e92 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static void pci_ecam_free(struct pci_config_window *cfg) > } > > static struct pci_config_window *gen_pci_init(struct dt_device_node *dev, > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops, > int ecam_reg_idx) > { > int err; > @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ static struct pci_config_window *gen_pci_init(struct > dt_device_node *dev, > > cfg->phys_addr = addr; > cfg->size = size; > + cfg->ops = ops; > > /* > * On 64-bit systems, we do a single ioremap for the whole config space > @@ -111,6 +113,13 @@ static struct pci_config_window *gen_pci_init(struct > dt_device_node *dev, > printk("ECAM at [mem %lx-%lx] for [bus %x-%x] \n",cfg->phys_addr, > cfg->phys_addr + cfg->size - 1, cfg->busn_start, cfg->busn_end); > > + if ( ops->init ) > + { > + err = ops->init(cfg); > + if (err) > + goto err_exit; > + } > + > return cfg; > > err_exit_remap: > @@ -216,6 +225,7 @@ static int pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct dt_device_node > *dev) > } > > int pci_host_common_probe(struct dt_device_node *dev, > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops, > int ecam_reg_idx) > { > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > @@ -227,7 +237,7 @@ int pci_host_common_probe(struct dt_device_node *dev, > return -ENOMEM; > > /* Parse and map our Configuration Space windows */ > - cfg = gen_pci_init(dev, ecam_reg_idx); > + cfg = gen_pci_init(dev, ops, ecam_reg_idx); > if ( !cfg ) > { > err = -ENOMEM; > @@ -236,6 +246,7 @@ int pci_host_common_probe(struct dt_device_node *dev, > > bridge->dt_node = dev; > bridge->sysdata = cfg; > + bridge->ops = &ops->pci_ops; > bridge->bus_start = cfg->busn_start; > bridge->bus_end = cfg->busn_end; > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-generic.c > b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-generic.c > index 13d0f7f999..2d652e8910 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-generic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-generic.c > @@ -23,20 +23,24 @@ > #include <asm/pci.h> > > static const struct dt_device_match gen_pci_dt_match[] = { > - { .compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic" }, > + { .compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic", > + .data = &pci_generic_ecam_ops }, > + > { }, > }; > > static int gen_pci_dt_init(struct dt_device_node *dev, const void *data) > { > const struct dt_device_match *of_id; > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops; > > of_id = dt_match_node(gen_pci_dt_match, dev->dev.of_node); > + ops = (struct pci_ecam_ops *) of_id->data; > > printk(XENLOG_INFO "Found PCI host bridge %s compatible:%s \n", > dt_node_full_name(dev), of_id->compatible); > > - return pci_host_common_probe(dev, 0); > + return pci_host_common_probe(dev, ops, 0); > } > > DT_DEVICE_START(pci_gen, "PCI HOST GENERIC", DEVICE_PCI) > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > index 58a51e724e..22866244d2 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct pci_config_window { > uint8_t busn_start; > uint8_t busn_end; > void __iomem *win; > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops; > }; > > /* > @@ -50,10 +51,41 @@ struct pci_host_bridge { > u8 bus_start; /* Bus start of this bridge. */ > u8 bus_end; /* Bus end of this bridge. */ > void *sysdata; /* Pointer to the config space window*/ > + const struct pci_ops *ops; > }; > > +struct pci_ops { > + void __iomem *(*map_bus)(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t offset); > + int (*read)(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t *value); > + int (*write)(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t value); > +}; > + > +/* > + * struct to hold pci ops and bus shift of the config window > + * for a PCI controller. > + */ > +struct pci_ecam_ops { > + unsigned int bus_shift; > + struct pci_ops pci_ops; > + int (*init)(struct pci_config_window *); Is this last member of the struct needed/used? > +}; > + > +/* Default ECAM ops */ > +extern const struct pci_ecam_ops pci_generic_ecam_ops; > + > int pci_host_common_probe(struct dt_device_node *dev, > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops, > int ecam_reg_idx); > +int pci_generic_config_read(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t *value); > +int pci_generic_config_write(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, uint32_t sbdf, > + uint32_t reg, uint32_t len, uint32_t value); > +void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, > + uint32_t sbdf, uint32_t where); > + > #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ > > struct arch_pci_dev { }; > -- > 2.17.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |