[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [PATCH 29/37] xen/arm: introduce a helper to parse device tree processor node
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2021年9月24日 10:45 > To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx; julien@xxxxxxx; > Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/37] xen/arm: introduce a helper to parse device > tree processor node > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Wei Chen wrote: > > Processor NUMA ID information is stored in device tree's processor > > node as "numa-node-id". We need a new helper to parse this ID from > > processor node. If we get this ID from processor node, this ID's > > validity still need to be checked. Once we got a invalid NUMA ID > > from any processor node, the device tree will be marked as NUMA > > information invalid. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + > > xen/arch/arm/numa_device_tree.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/numa_device_tree.c > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile > > index 41ca311b6b..c50df2c25d 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-y += mem_access.o > > obj-y += mm.o > > obj-y += monitor.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += numa.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_NUMA) += numa_device_tree.o > > obj-y += p2m.o > > obj-y += percpu.o > > obj-y += platform.o > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/numa_device_tree.c > b/xen/arch/arm/numa_device_tree.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..2428fbae0b > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/numa_device_tree.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Arm Architecture support layer for NUMA. > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Arm Ltd > > + * > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > > + * > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + * > > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > > + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > + * > > + */ > > +#include <xen/init.h> > > +#include <xen/nodemask.h> > > +#include <xen/numa.h> > > +#include <xen/libfdt/libfdt.h> > > +#include <xen/device_tree.h> > > + > > +/* Callback for device tree processor affinity */ > > +static int __init fdt_numa_processor_affinity_init(nodeid_t node) > > +{ > > + if ( srat_disabled() ) > > + return -EINVAL; > > fdt_numa_processor_affinity_init is called by fdt_parse_numa_cpu_node > which is already parsing NUMA related info. Should this srat_disabled > check be moved to fdt_parse_numa_cpu_node? > Ah, yes, it's a good suggestion, I will address it in next version. > > > + else if ( node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES ) > > + { > > + bad_srat(); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + numa_set_processor_nodes_parsed(node); > > + fw_numa = 1; > > + > > + printk(KERN_INFO "DT: NUMA node %"PRIu7" processor parsed\n", node); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* Parse CPU NUMA node info */ > > +static int __init fdt_parse_numa_cpu_node(const void *fdt, int node) > > +{ > > + uint32_t nid; > > + > > + nid = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, "numa-node-id", MAX_NUMNODES); > > + if ( nid >= MAX_NUMNODES ) > > + { > > + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid); > ^ PRIu32 > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + return fdt_numa_processor_affinity_init(nid); > > +} > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |