[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] libxl: Only map legacy PCI IRQs if they are supported


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:02:02 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=epam.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=epam.com; dkim=pass header.d=epam.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=BXNqTsz23BP+4qe5sIekQ17PL4tWH7PxtLQ28xGn6Ms=; b=PAgziZrtTleVZRW01YoxHC7FFsb7Vha6aoNKad5XCAvGFDQCUOaMvW/bB8/0cm9jFZyHkNfTO0vXLX5L3IW4WBEK9qxSazgYuZkbfcSfqttTg1nIsn5sLdn5b+dkeKl/iIHlZKW+YMKYvGuUzZBjagMKDDHdWbpqENFj0RVw87Yh8adIG67FZJS9BA9L3huA+M+5ARjCSBdXLcLor8QNdonaqkVVL6bd2Nbu9yuNPAfBLofsFGg+y6iHWWNK+32swaxG2xGtWxF1EbkfJI/GOVSNJvSBpBnr8BPOZ04rIqcXUVZRdWajdp+443IKP/ZfKtVfdR3BW9g4WkuLpo028A==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jAnVsz+UNOIb5ef5C2Fwv4Ix6NmaiZgA4ICMDlUIO5iOJeIMJeakkZkGr8ZvzpiX8c67rQ4raIqqitPKDRMOnCQqs8CdTY+9I8xLUiLXBdeKOrI7puOW+IyAgPuLnoEqkdeSkgGCZg+WZQJxALnxGYSgZ4EIBSSBKqzDOejCXr/5pPa3nWISmNtZsZVYkZo2zk4BozKwzRu8gMQ13WTRHXj4jNzn0qn4/N7mFrEZzJuNXb5sJ5W+mZwsx+gmt3EjNa1E3C4wvJcW1o2HpEivkApKGm0qYQA9NT6Sz6cPN2S/72uYYvb81zDKwQ/mlYnWPp7NmO0SDxuYk4PqOxz67A==
  • Authentication-results: kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kernel.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=epam.com;
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "julien@xxxxxxx" <julien@xxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Artem Mygaiev <Artem_Mygaiev@xxxxxxxx>, "roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>, "jbeulich@xxxxxxxx" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:02:21 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Thread-index: AQHXsHo1c5aXAigXoEuHbQuK2gbS5Kuz4U+AgAP9dgA=
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 08/11] libxl: Only map legacy PCI IRQs if they are supported

On 25.09.21 03:06, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Arm's PCI passthrough implementation doesn't support legacy interrupts,
>> but MSI/MSI-X. This can be the case for other platforms too.
>> For that reason introduce a new CONFIG_PCI_SUPP_LEGACY_IRQ and add
>> it to the CFLAGS and compile the relevant code in the toolstack only if
>> applicable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> Since v1:
>>   - Minimized #idefery by introducing pci_supp_legacy_irq function
>>     for relevant checks
>> ---
>>   tools/libs/light/Makefile    |  4 ++++
>>   tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/Makefile b/tools/libs/light/Makefile
>> index 7d8c51d49242..bd3f6be2a183 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/Makefile
>> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ CFLAGS += -Wno-format-zero-length -Wmissing-declarations \
>>      -Wno-declaration-after-statement -Wformat-nonliteral
>>   CFLAGS += -I.
>>   
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86),y)
>> +CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_PCI_SUPP_LEGACY_IRQ
>> +endif
> This patch is a lot better than the previous version, thanks!
>
> I think the usage of pci_supp_legacy_irq below is good and we can't do
> better than that.
>
> I wonder if there is a better way than the above to export
> CONFIG_PCI_SUPP_LEGACY_IRQ. Suggestions?

I see nothing bad doing it this way, maybe Ian or Juergen can tell

if this is acceptable?

>
>
>>   SRCS-$(CONFIG_X86) += libxl_cpuid.c
>>   SRCS-$(CONFIG_X86) += libxl_x86.c
>>   SRCS-$(CONFIG_X86) += libxl_psr.c
>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
>> index 59f3686fc85e..4c2d7aeefbb2 100644
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_pci.c
>> @@ -1364,6 +1364,15 @@ static void pci_add_timeout(libxl__egc *egc, 
>> libxl__ev_time *ev,
>>       pci_add_dm_done(egc, pas, rc);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool pci_supp_legacy_irq(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_SUPP_LEGACY_IRQ
>> +    return true;
>> +#else
>> +    return false;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
>>                               pci_add_state *pas,
>>                               int rc)
>> @@ -1434,6 +1443,8 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
>>           }
>>       }
>>       fclose(f);
>> +    if (!pci_supp_legacy_irq())
>> +        goto out_no_irq;
>>       sysfs_path = GCSPRINTF(SYSFS_PCI_DEV"/"PCI_BDF"/irq", pci->domain,
>>                                   pci->bus, pci->dev, pci->func);
>>       f = fopen(sysfs_path, "r");
>> @@ -1983,6 +1994,8 @@ static void do_pci_remove(libxl__egc *egc, 
>> pci_remove_state *prs)
>>           }
>>           fclose(f);
>>   skip1:
>> +        if (!pci_supp_legacy_irq())
>> +            goto skip_irq;
>>           sysfs_path = GCSPRINTF(SYSFS_PCI_DEV"/"PCI_BDF"/irq", pci->domain,
>>                                  pci->bus, pci->dev, pci->func);
>>           f = fopen(sysfs_path, "r");
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.