[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V5 12/12] net: netvsc: Add Isolation VM support for netvsc driver
- To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:48:21 +0200
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, vkuznets <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, "parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx" <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>, "dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>, Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx" <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "bp@xxxxxxxxx" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "luto@xxxxxxxxxx" <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, "peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jgross@xxxxxxxx" <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "joro@xxxxxxxxxx" <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, "will@xxxxxxxxxx" <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, "davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kuba@xxxxxxxxxx" <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "arnd@xxxxxxxx" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, "m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx" <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "robin.murphy@xxxxxxx" <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, "brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx" <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>, Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx" <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, "pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx" <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "rppt@xxxxxxxxxx" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "saravanand@xxxxxx" <saravanand@xxxxxx>, "krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx" <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tj@xxxxxxxxxx" <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx" <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 05:48:46 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 05:23:31PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>>
>> - the bare memremap usage in swiotlb looks strange and I'd
>> definitively expect a well documented wrapper.
>
> OK. Should the wrapper in the DMA code? How about dma_map_decrypted()
> introduced in the V4?
A mentioned then the name is a pretty bad choice as it touches the dma_map*
namespace that it is not related to. I suspect just a little helper
in the swiotlb code that explains how it is used might be enogh for now.
|
