Ping: [PATCH] x86/paging: restrict physical address width reported to guests

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 29.09.2021 14:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Modern hardware may report more than 48 bits of physical address width.
> For paging-external guests our P2M implementation does not cope with
> larger values. Telling the guest of more available bits means misleading
> it into perhaps trying to actually put some page there (like was e.g.
> intermediately done in OVMF for the shared info page).
> 
> While there also convert the PV check to a paging-external one (which in
> our current code base are synonyms of one another anyway).
> 
> Fixes: 5dbd60e16a1f ("x86/shadow: Correct guest behaviour when creating PTEs 
> above maxphysaddr")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Anyone?

Thanks, Jan

> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/paging.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/paging.h
> @@ -401,11 +401,18 @@ static always_inline unsigned int paging
>  {
>      unsigned int bits = paging_mode_hap(d) ? hap_paddr_bits : paddr_bits;
>  
> -    if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BIGMEM) && paging_mode_shadow(d) &&
> -         !is_pv_domain(d) )
> +    if ( paging_mode_external(d) )
>      {
> -        /* Shadowed superpages store GFNs in 32-bit page_info fields. */
> -        bits = min(bits, 32U + PAGE_SHIFT);
> +        if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BIGMEM) && paging_mode_shadow(d) )
> +        {
> +            /* Shadowed superpages store GFNs in 32-bit page_info fields. */
> +            bits = min(bits, 32U + PAGE_SHIFT);
> +        }
> +        else
> +        {
> +            /* Both p2m-ept and p2m-pt only support 4-level page tables. */
> +            bits = min(bits, 48U);
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      return bits;
> 
>