[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM)


  • To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:15:21 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=HbAihz/x6+FQaM93I6Lv4PIswepqt8mIpMxvUa2xX7o=; b=ggqBCoUIgAyZRVue6p19AWgks4lJQnc1304JP4AbUYGZSA+XDU+mIOItuAod6jJzJ/oYbmC/AQ3OzIemxhgL4S1m4OBRVczuQGZnD82qdxfn4LyFcpNSxqRN0tCGZ8zrF+c3KF8Po4oVD/6wsGiLO1YB4sVs+F/BrInjLKuZ/Sl8tG/HD1bl23nzeRprDzQPEbmozOwUtEyT9Ecwj9z/batsEe8rCGi0St+kcxfR8Pj4R1/GvktlJVzd3jUGAUvh2v6v37mz+2i8EVw3SOFDqMTaFOHhwzVuWvxfAjVZk/hMr2cL5pTBwBCYDSxTXO+ZnZpTeqSKG33zivO6CFWlGA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=l3pUvR67IBvRTo9fRDwgnRj2VcmCu5LSGp+PwqiWOmRJOxDN9IJNaFCrFn7aOfokXYZ2ZPpbS5OQeAePHVMWAN5OspFeHXkJTZti2qjsnIihT65zcZ8SztcL5908V3Ne32dprFBQ/o/0S+7oe5bjArBrBP4dl+zbPqbD1wDNcAt+Fr2pLDDMUzE7yIno48hIn/ozudDJrZMUAU1TPnGNFvTHpvoRRUtlYP87hS5gh1BPN+ztT1OID4zrmRyiSl8D2gwJUWzyI2opdGrR8zV84MJ5gkKFFYEI5i8Ha+R+SSIPfdnfpEOZ92QLOfgJLaYrE5BFfEQxr5X3RL+nbswYSg==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@xxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:15:46 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHXxl4YkvgVlFH7LEi1mWK2psfiI6vdbqqA
  • Thread-topic: xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM)

Hi Julien,

> On 21 Oct 2021, at 10:28, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> While going through the passthrough code. I noticed that we don't have a 
> common lock for the IOMMU between the PCI and DT code.
> 
> This is going to be an issue given it would technically be possible to add a 
> PCI device while assigning a DT.
> 
> Rahul, Bertrand, Oleksandr, can you have a look at the issue?

Yes we can have a look at this.

Right now pci device add is done by dom0 so I do not think we have an issue in 
practice unless I wrongly understood something.
But for sure in theory yes we need to look at this.

Cheers
Bertrand 

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On 06/10/2021 18:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hardware domain is in charge of doing the PCI enumeration and will
>> discover the PCI devices and then will communicate to XEN via hyper
>> call PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add(..) to add the PCI devices in XEN.
>> Also implement PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove(..) to remove the PCI device.
>> As most of the code for PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_* is the same between x86
>> and ARM, move the code to a common file to avoid duplication.
>> There are other PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_* operations to add PCI devices.
>> Currently implemented PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove(..) and
>> PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add(..) only as those are minimum required to
>> support PCI passthrough on ARM.
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Change in v5:
>> - Move the pci_physdev_op() stub to xen/arch/arm/physdev.c.
>> Change in v4:
>> - Move file commom/physdev.c to drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> - minor comments.
>> Change in v3: Fixed minor comment.
>> Change in v2:
>> - Add support for PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove()
>> - Move code to common code
>> ---
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/physdev.c        |  6 ++-
>>  xen/arch/x86/physdev.c        | 52 +----------------------
>>  xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c |  2 +-
>>  xen/drivers/pci/Makefile      |  1 +
>>  xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  xen/include/public/arch-arm.h |  4 +-
>>  xen/include/xen/hypercall.h   |  4 ++
>>  7 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c b/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> index e91355fe22..f9aa274dda 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> @@ -8,13 +8,17 @@
>>  #include <xen/lib.h>
>>  #include <xen/errno.h>
>>  #include <xen/sched.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>      int do_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>  {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
>> +    return pci_physdev_op(cmd, arg);
>> +#else
>>      gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "PHYSDEVOP cmd=%d: not implemented\n", cmd);
>>      return -ENOSYS;
>> +#endif
>>  }
>>    /*
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> index 23465bcd00..ea38be8b79 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/io_apic.h>
>>  #include <asm/msi.h>
>>  #include <asm/hvm/irq.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>  #include <public/xen.h>
>>  #include <public/physdev.h>
>>  #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>> @@ -480,54 +480,6 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, 
>> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>          break;
>>      }
>>  -    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add: {
>> -        struct physdev_pci_device_add add;
>> -        struct pci_dev_info pdev_info;
>> -        nodeid_t node;
>> -
>> -        ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        if ( copy_from_guest(&add, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> -            break;
>> -
>> -        pdev_info.is_extfn = !!(add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_EXTFN);
>> -        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_VIRTFN )
>> -        {
>> -            pdev_info.is_virtfn = 1;
>> -            pdev_info.physfn.bus = add.physfn.bus;
>> -            pdev_info.physfn.devfn = add.physfn.devfn;
>> -        }
>> -        else
>> -            pdev_info.is_virtfn = 0;
>> -
>> -        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_PXM )
>> -        {
>> -            uint32_t pxm;
>> -            size_t optarr_off = offsetof(struct physdev_pci_device_add, 
>> optarr) /
>> -                                sizeof(add.optarr[0]);
>> -
>> -            if ( copy_from_guest_offset(&pxm, arg, optarr_off, 1) )
>> -                break;
>> -
>> -            node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
>> -        }
>> -        else
>> -            node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> -
>> -        ret = pci_add_device(add.seg, add.bus, add.devfn, &pdev_info, node);
>> -        break;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove: {
>> -        struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> -
>> -        ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        if ( copy_from_guest(&dev, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> -            break;
>> -
>> -        ret = pci_remove_device(dev.seg, dev.bus, dev.devfn);
>> -        break;
>> -    }
>> -
>>      case PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix:
>>      case PHYSDEVOP_release_msix: {
>>          struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> @@ -663,7 +615,7 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, 
>> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>      }
>>        default:
>> -        ret = -ENOSYS;
>> +        ret = pci_physdev_op(cmd, arg);
>>          break;
>>      }
>>  diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> index 0a50cbd4d8..e3cbd5ebcb 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ EMIT_FILE;
>>  #include <compat/xen.h>
>>  #include <compat/event_channel.h>
>>  #include <compat/physdev.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>    #define do_physdev_op compat_physdev_op
>>  diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile b/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> index a98035df4c..972c923db0 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>>  obj-y += pci.o
>> +obj-y += physdev.o
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..4f3e1a96c0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>> +
>> +#include <xen/guest_access.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/init.h>
>> +
>> +#ifndef COMPAT
>> +typedef long ret_t;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +ret_t pci_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>> +{
>> +    ret_t ret;
>> +
>> +    switch ( cmd )
>> +    {
>> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add: {
>> +        struct physdev_pci_device_add add;
>> +        struct pci_dev_info pdev_info;
>> +        nodeid_t node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +
>> +        ret = -EFAULT;
>> +        if ( copy_from_guest(&add, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        pdev_info.is_extfn = (add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_EXTFN);
>> +        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_VIRTFN )
>> +        {
>> +            pdev_info.is_virtfn = true;
>> +            pdev_info.physfn.bus = add.physfn.bus;
>> +            pdev_info.physfn.devfn = add.physfn.devfn;
>> +        }
>> +        else
>> +            pdev_info.is_virtfn = false;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_PXM )
>> +        {
>> +            uint32_t pxm;
>> +            size_t optarr_off = offsetof(struct physdev_pci_device_add, 
>> optarr) /
>> +                                sizeof(add.optarr[0]);
>> +
>> +            if ( copy_from_guest_offset(&pxm, arg, optarr_off, 1) )
>> +                break;
>> +
>> +            node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
>> +        }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +        ret = pci_add_device(add.seg, add.bus, add.devfn, &pdev_info, node);
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove: {
>> +        struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> +
>> +        ret = -EFAULT;
>> +        if ( copy_from_guest(&dev, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        ret = pci_remove_device(dev.seg, dev.bus, dev.devfn);
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    default:
>> +        ret = -ENOSYS;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Local variables:
>> + * mode: C
>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>> + * tab-width: 4
>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>> + * End:
>> + */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> index 6b5a5f818a..d46c61fca9 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@
>>   *   All generic sub-operations
>>   *
>>   *  HYPERVISOR_physdev_op
>> - *   No sub-operations are currenty supported
>> + *   Exactly these sub-operations are supported:
>> + *   PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add
>> + *   PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove
>>   *
>>   *  HYPERVISOR_sysctl
>>   *   All generic sub-operations, with the exception of:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> index 3771487a30..07b10ec230 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ extern long
>>  do_platform_op(
>>      XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_platform_op_t) u_xenpf_op);
>>  +extern long
>> +pci_physdev_op(
>> +    int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * To allow safe resume of do_memory_op() after preemption, we need to know
>>   * at what point in the page list to resume. For this purpose I steal the
> 
> -- 
> Julien Grall




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.