Re: [PATCH v2 27/45] mfd: ntxec: Use devm_register_power_handler()

[Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/7/21 8:53 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 06.11.2021 23:54, Jonathan Neuschäfer пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:57AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > > Use devm_register_power_handler() that replaces global pm_power_off
> > > variable and allows to register multiple power-off handlers. It also
> > > provides restart-handler support, i.e. all in one API.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > When I boot with (most of) this patchset applied, I get the warning at
> > kernel/reboot.c:187:
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Handler must have unique priority. Otherwise call order is
> >          * determined by registration order, which is unreliable.
> >          */
> >         WARN_ON(!atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(&restart_handler_list, 
> > nb));
> >
> > As the NTXEC driver doesn't specify a priority, I think this is an issue
> > to be fixed elsewhere.
> >
> > Other than that, it works and looks good, as far as I can tell.
> >
> >
> > For this patch:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
> Thank you. You have conflicting restart handlers, apparently NTXEC
> driver should have higher priority than the watchdog driver. It should
> be a common problem for the watchdog drivers, I will lower watchdog's
> default priority to fix it.
The watchdog subsystem already uses "0" as default priority, which was
intended as priority of last resort for restart handlers. I do not see
a reason to change that.

Guenter