[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] xen: drop hypercall function tables
On 08.11.21 09:36, Jan Beulich wrote: On 05.11.2021 15:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:On 01/11/2021 15:20, Juergen Gross wrote:In order to avoid indirect function calls on the hypercall path as much as possible this series is removing the hypercall function tables and is replacing the hypercall handler calls via the function array by automatically generated call macros. Another by-product of generating the call macros is the automatic generating of the hypercall handler prototypes from the same data base which is used to generate the macros. This has the additional advantage of using type safe calls of the handlers and to ensure related handler (e.g. PV and HVM ones) share the same prototypes. A very brief performance test (parallel build of the Xen hypervisor in a 6 vcpu guest) showed a very slim improvement (less than 1%) of the performance with the patches applied. The test was performed using a PV and a PVH guest. Changes in V2: - new patches 6, 14, 15 - patch 7: support hypercall priorities for faster code - comments addressed Juergen Gross (15): xen: limit number of hypercall parameters to 5 xen: move do_vcpu_op() to arch specific code xen: harmonize return types of hypercall handlers xen/x86: modify hvm_memory_op() prototype xen: don't include asm/hypercall.h from C sources add .gitignore entries for *.[is] below xen xen: generate hypercall interface related code xen: use generated prototypes for hypercall handlers x86/pv-shim: don't modify hypercall table xen/x86: don't use hypercall table for calling compat hypercalls xen/x86: call hypercall handlers via generated macro xen/arm: call hypercall handlers via generated macro xen/x86: add hypercall performance counters for hvm, correct pv xen: drop calls_to_multicall performance counter tools/xenperf: update hypercall nameshttps://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/andyhhp/xen/-/jobs/1752237172 Something here causes hypercall.c: In function 'hvm_hypercall': hypercall.c:174:23: error: unused variable 'r8' [-Werror=unused-variable] 174 | unsigned long r8 = regs->r8; | ^~ hypercall.c:190:22: error: unused variable 'edi' [-Werror=unused-variable] 190 | unsigned int edi = regs->edi; | ^~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors I suspect it will be "call hypercall handlers via generated macro", but I haven't investigated further.I suspect that's a randconfig build with !HYPFS + !ARGO. The hypfs and argo hypercalls are the only ones with 5 parameters that HVM wires up. A similar issue ought to exist in PV hypercall handling though, as the compat form of update_va_mapping_otherdomain is the only other one taking 5 arguments. As to possible solutions - besides maybe adding (void)r8 to the -ENOSYS path, I was wondering anyway in how far the local variables are still warranted to retain. I think dropping those local variables is the easiest solution. And I think this applies to the PV variant, too. Juergen Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |