[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH for-4.16] xen/arm: don't assign domU static-mem to dom0 as reserved-memory
Hi Stefano, On 09/11/2021 00:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote: From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> DomUs static-mem ranges are added to the reserved_mem array for accounting, but they shouldn't be assigned to dom0 as the other regular reserved-memory ranges in device tree. In make_memory_nodes, fix the error by skipping banks with xen_domain set to true in the reserved-memory array. Also make sure to use the first valid (!xen_domain) start address for the memory node name. This is a bug fix. So please add a Fixes tag. In this case, I think it should be: Fixes: 41c031ff437b ("xen/arm: introduce domain on Static Allocation") I find this comment a bit misleading because make_memory_node() will also be called to create normal memory region. I would drop "reserved-memory" and add a comment on top of the loop explaining what the loop does.Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This patch should be considered for 4.16 as it fixes an incorrect behavior. The risk is low for two reasons: - the change is simple - make_memory_node is easily tested because it gets called at every boot, e.g. gitlab-ci and OSSTest exercise this path I tested this patch successfully with and without xen,static-mem. --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index 1fbafeaea8..56d3ff9d08 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -874,11 +874,17 @@ static int __init make_memory_node(const struct domain *d, if ( mem->nr_banks == 0 ) return -ENOENT;+ for ( i = 0; i < mem->nr_banks && mem->bank[i].xen_domain; i++ )+ ; + /* No reserved-memory ranges to expose to Dom0 */ + if ( i == mem->nr_banks ) + return 0; + dt_dprintk("Create memory node (reg size %d, nr cells %d)\n", reg_size, nr_cells); I think you need to adjust nr_cells otherwise we would write garbagge in the DT if we need to exclude some regions. /* ePAPR 3.4 */- snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "memory@%"PRIx64, mem->bank[0].start); + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "memory@%"PRIx64, mem->bank[i].start); res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, buf); if ( res ) return res; @@ -888,11 +894,14 @@ static int __init make_memory_node(const struct domain *d, return res;cells = ®[0];- for ( i = 0 ; i < mem->nr_banks; i++ ) + for ( ; i < mem->nr_banks; i++ ) { u64 start = mem->bank[i].start; u64 size = mem->bank[i].size;+ if ( mem->bank[i].xen_domain )+ continue; + dt_dprintk(" Bank %d: %#"PRIx64"->%#"PRIx64"\n", i, start, start + size); Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |