[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 08/16] perf: Force architectures to opt-in to guest callbacks
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 22/09/21 02:05, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > @@ -1273,6 +1274,11 @@ static inline unsigned int > > > perf_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr(void) > > > } > > > extern void perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(struct > > > perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs); > > > extern void perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct > > > perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs); > > > +#else > > > +static inline unsigned int perf_guest_state(void) { > > > return 0; } > > > +static inline unsigned long perf_guest_get_ip(void) { > > > return 0; } > > > +static inline unsigned int perf_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr(void) { > > > return 0; } > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS */ > > > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Having perf_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr in generic code is a bit off. Of > > course it has to be in the struct, but the wrapper might be placed in > > arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h as well (applies to patch 7 as well). > > Yeah, I went with this option purely to keep everything bundled together. I > have > no strong opinion. Scratch, that, I do have an opinion. perf_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr() is in common code because the callbacks themselves and perf_get_guest_cbs() are defined in linux/perf_event.h, _after_ asm/perf_event.h is included. arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h is quite bereft of includes, so there's no obvious landing spot for those two things, and adding a new header seems like overkill.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |