| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] perf: Ensure perf_guest_cbs aren't reloaded between !NULL check and deref
 
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:39:52 +0000Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@xxxxxxxxx>,	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>,	James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>,	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>,	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>,	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>,	Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	Artem Kashkanov <artem.kashkanov@xxxxxxxxx>,	Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>,	Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>,	Vincent Chen <deanbo422@xxxxxxxxx>,	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx>,	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Hu <nickhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>,	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:40:19 +0000List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org> 
 On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/4/21 15:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > If I'm interpeting Paolo's suggestion
> > correctly, he's pointing out that oustanding stores to the function 
> > pointers in
> > @cbs need to complete before assigning a non-NULL pointer to perf_guest_cbs,
> > otherwise a perf event handler may see a valid pointer with half-baked 
> > callbacks.
> > 
> > I think smp_store_release() with a comment would be appropriate, assuming my
> > above interpretation is correct.
> > 
> 
> Yes, exactly.  It should even be rcu_assign_pointer(), matching the
> synchronize_rcu()
And perf_guest_cbs should be tagged __rcu and accessed accordingly.  Which is
effectively what this version (poorly) implemented with a homebrewed mix of
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE, lockdep(), and synchronize_rcu().
> in patch 1 (and the change can be done in patch 1, too).
Ya, the change needs to go into patch 1.
 |