[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: ACPI/UEFI support for Xen/ARM status?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 04:02:36PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Elliott, > > On 12/11/2021 15:44, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 05:54:08AM +0000, Henry Wang wrote: > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > >>> Elliott Mitchell > >>> > >>> I've been busy with another part of this project, so I've lost track of > >>> progress on ACPI/UEFI support on ARM. > >>> > >>> Last I'd read full support for ACPI/UEFI seemed a ways off. Using a stub > >>> domain to constrain ACPI table parsing seemed the favored approach. I > >>> was under the impression that would take some time. > >>> > >>> What is the status? Do the Xen/ARM leads have any guesses for when full > >>> ACPI/UEFI support might reach completion? > >> > >> I am doing some development based on the Xen UEFI/ACPI on AArch64 using > >> the Arm FVP_Base platform. Using edk2 and master branch of Xen with > >> `CONFIG_ACPI=y`, it seems everything can work properly. > >> > >> Here are some of my logs: > >> Shell> FS2:EFI\XEN\xen.efi > >> Xen 4.16-rc (c/s Fri Nov 12 02:34:01 2021 +0000 git:323b47ffd9-dirty) EFI > >> loader > >> ... > >> (XEN) PFN compression on bits 20...22 > >> (XEN) ACPI: RSDP F5E30018, 0024 (r2 LINARO) > >> (XEN) ACPI: XSDT F5E3FE98, 005C (r1 LINARO RTSMVEV8 2 1000013) > >> (XEN) ACPI: FACP F5E3FA98, 0114 (r6 LINARO RTSMVEV8 2 LNRO 2) > >> (XEN) ACPI: DSDT F5E3ED98, 02AB (r2 LINARO RTSMVEV8 4 INTL 20200925) > >> (XEN) ACPI: GTDT F5E3FC18, 00E0 (r2 LINARO RTSMVEV8 2 LNRO 2) > >> (XEN) ACPI: APIC F5E3E998, 02D4 (r4 LINARO RTSMVEV8 2 LNRO 2) > >> (XEN) ACPI: SPCR F5E3FF98, 0050 (r2 LINARO RTSMVEV8 2 LNRO 2) > >> (XEN) Domain heap initialised > > > >> ... > >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SPCR 0x00000000F5E3FF98 000050 (v02 LINARO RTSMVEV8 > >> 00000002 LNRO 00000002) > >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SPCR: console: pl011,mmio32,0x1c090000,115200 > >> ... > >> > >> Hopefully this answers your question. :) > > > > Thanks for the attempt at answering, but the SPCR entry tells me there is > > a substantial portion of ACPI/UEFI functionality you're not testing. I'm > > specifically looking for framebuffer console support and SPCR says you're > > using serial console. While serial console is appropriate for true > > servers, for some use cases it is inadequate. > > We don't have any support for framebuffer in Xen on Arm (even for > Device-Tree). I would be happy to consider any patches if you are plan > to post some. Xen on ARM doesn't need a framebuffer itself, but it can be valuable to have Domain 0 able to access a framebuffer. > > Julien Grall and Stefano Stabellini had been proposing doing ACPI table > > parsing in a stub domain, but I'm unaware of the status. Not finding > > much suggests it hasn't gone very far yet. > > This was a very early proposal in case we needed to parse the DSDT in > Xen. This hasn't been needed so far, hence why this is not implemented > and no-one worked on it. > > I am not very familiar how the framebuffer is detected in ACPI. Can you > provide more details on what exactly you want to parse? > > Alternatively, UEFI is meant to provide an API to access the > framebuffer. Would that be suitable for you? Last time I tried booting on UEFI, Domain 0 (Linux) was unable to access the framebuffer on this device. Whereas the same kernel directly on top of UEFI/ACPI was fully able to access the framebuffer (and graphics chip). I had been left with the impression the DSDT parsing was going to be needed for Domain 0 to access the framebuffer. This was found unnecessary for framebuffer access for Domain 0? (Raspberry PI 4B with the Tianocore/EDK2 image) -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sigmsg@xxxxxxx PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |