[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH 5/7] xz: fix spelling in comments
From: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@xxxxxxxxxxx> uncompressible -> incompressible non-splitted -> non-split Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211010213145.17462-6-xiang@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@xxxxxxxxxxx> [Linux commit: 0a434e0a2c9f4395e4560aac22677ef25ab4afd9] Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/common/unxz.c +++ b/xen/common/unxz.c @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ * * The worst case for in-place decompression is that the beginning of * the file is compressed extremely well, and the rest of the file is - * uncompressible. Thus, we must look for worst-case expansion when the - * compressor is encoding uncompressible data. + * incompressible. Thus, we must look for worst-case expansion when the + * compressor is encoding incompressible data. * * The structure of the .xz file in case of a compressed kernel is as follows. * Sizes (as bytes) of the fields are in parenthesis. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ * uncompressed size of the payload is in practice never less than the * payload size itself. The LZMA2 format would allow uncompressed size * to be less than the payload size, but no sane compressor creates such - * files. LZMA2 supports storing uncompressible data in uncompressed form, + * files. LZMA2 supports storing incompressible data in uncompressed form, * so there's never a need to create payloads whose uncompressed size is * smaller than the compressed size. * @@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ * memeq and memzero are not used much and any remotely sane implementation * is fast enough. memcpy/memmove speed matters in multi-call mode, but * the kernel image is decompressed in single-call mode, in which only - * memmove speed can matter and only if there is a lot of uncompressible data - * (LZMA2 stores uncompressible chunks in uncompressed form). Thus, the + * memmove speed can matter and only if there is a lot of incompressible data + * (LZMA2 stores incompressible chunks in uncompressed form). Thus, the * functions below should just be kept small; it's probably not worth * optimizing for speed. */ --- a/xen/common/xz/dec_lzma2.c +++ b/xen/common/xz/dec_lzma2.c @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static always_inline void rc_normalize(s * functions so that the compiler is supposed to be able to more easily avoid * an extra branch. In this particular version of the LZMA decoder, this * doesn't seem to be a good idea (tested with GCC 3.3.6, 3.4.6, and 4.3.3 - * on x86). Using a non-splitted version results in nicer looking code too. + * on x86). Using a non-split version results in nicer looking code too. * * NOTE: This must return an int. Do not make it return a bool or the speed * of the code generated by GCC 3.x decreases 10-15 %. (GCC 4.3 doesn't care,
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |