[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 63/65] x86/setup: Rework MSR_S_CET handling for CET-IBT


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:49:15 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ETWBE5Tgi7RxJH6hIPyvMR1Kms4ofCQDjyr6RKVTKrI=; b=EAzv1dyFhRcnC+CVCC2YNjIeSwRLb6M7HmJ5NvJ5GdpEiUqfA2d+ItmhdsNrcFx0dgDyjNEUkXAsDjr+OAzq0Ir6YgneuzQevot/s5cx7/+fpDgzLOz6PCUiTcxH6qwlhC5XexrEdHIWjTi+v+sUX1BlRa8w+SuTc6fo8b6+sP1GlFlvL5cj9C75KY9nW4CnU01RpF+2gvxrDid4RyNEX+30aRsOuLa5k9dOfR5Xrk1hVJXwRvnpoS37cabTNSYJc1X1aHlUICWfAcWQFfpeXSAO8+2tetd7JDMC8VDLg2gGhRmtl5SVZXEtEEpU86l1XplfA1BLR4w9h6fMQ2S+ng==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mmBMBWBJiy7PS2KeTKkIy5zGDqm9Ig/Dts85EHda4+x6uhWBTJ4paL90Cb8yxrE2Kex1mjBN9ar666BBCLAbPigZ0VmepZpB75aTCLBdzFD0ulIcGmk2D9AuJECQbCRlVqX1yjPMkKuIHRaxtQwcWAfeOT8rZp0S0Lfr6Zm3XXltRUnZ4ivLsgFrxSkBC6E1pu+OpJrHz3SitFYqHDtLVvBAgRAOEch54I1i2w/AtnNrBFm3kX1A9wK4tuIFmfyX3hcANbqqGv+vpCnr9bAOjH7gjrl7n8YgUXuIWn/m9KpqfStU2b0EYR1ziNKYkvfXk3eMwUAtc0uuQUDFdcOEsw==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 10:49:37 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 26.11.2021 13:34, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
> @@ -63,7 +63,24 @@ ENTRY(s3_resume)
>          pushq   %rax
>          lretq
>  1:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_SHSTK
> +#if defined(CONFIG_XEN_SHSTK) || defined(CONFIG_XEN_IBT)
> +        call    xen_msr_s_cet_value
> +        test    %eax, %eax
> +        je      .L_cet_done

Nit: I consider it generally misleading to use JE / JNE (and a few
other Jcc) with other than CMP-like insns. Only those handle actual
"relations", whereas e.g. TEST only produces particular flag states,
so would more consistently be followed by JZ / JNZ in cases like
this one. But since this is very much a matter of taste, I'm not
going to insist on a change here.

> +        /* Set up MSR_S_CET. */
> +        mov     $MSR_S_CET, %ecx
> +        xor     %edx, %edx
> +        wrmsr
> +
> +        /* Enable CR4.CET. */
> +        mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4 | X86_CR4_CET, %ecx
> +        mov     %rcx, %cr4

Is it valid / safe to enable CR4.CET (with CET_SHSTK_EN already
active) before ...

> +#if defined(CONFIG_XEN_SHSTK)
> +        test    $CET_SHSTK_EN, %eax

(Intermediate remark: Using %al would seem to suffice and be a
shorter encoding.)

> +        je      .L_cet_done
> +
>          /*
>           * Restoring SSP is a little complicated, because we are intercepting
>           * an in-use shadow stack.  Write a temporary token under the stack,
> @@ -71,14 +88,6 @@ ENTRY(s3_resume)
>           * reset MSR_PL0_SSP to its usual value and pop the temporary token.
>           */
>          mov     saved_ssp(%rip), %rdi
> -        cmpq    $1, %rdi
> -        je      .L_shstk_done
> -
> -        /* Set up MSR_S_CET. */
> -        mov     $MSR_S_CET, %ecx
> -        xor     %edx, %edx
> -        mov     $CET_SHSTK_EN | CET_WRSS_EN, %eax
> -        wrmsr
>  
>          /* Construct the temporary supervisor token under SSP. */
>          sub     $8, %rdi
> @@ -90,12 +99,9 @@ ENTRY(s3_resume)
>          mov     %edi, %eax
>          wrmsr
>  
> -        /* Enable CET.  MSR_INTERRUPT_SSP_TABLE is set up later in 
> load_system_tables(). */
> -        mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4 | X86_CR4_CET, %ebx
> -        mov     %rbx, %cr4

... the writing of MSR_PL0_SSP in context here? ISTR some ordering
issues back at the time when you introduced CET-SS, so I thought I'd
better ask to be sure.

Jan




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.