Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: introduce INVALID_{G,M}FN_RAW

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Jan,

On 10/12/2021 09:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This allows properly tying together INVALID_{G,M}FN and
> INVALID_{G,M}FN_INITIALIZER as well as using the actual values in
> compile time constant expressions (or even preprocessor dirctives).
>
> Since INVALID_PFN is unused, and with x86'es paging_mark_pfn_dirty()
> being the only user of pfn_t it also doesn't seem likely that new uses
> would appear, remove that one at this same occasion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall