[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] x86/cmdline: Interpret 'vpmu' as a positive boolean
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:44:05 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=8jC6mGHn2Ad2BGiJFLUZjUmDowOsvazMP52tFaHd/OY=; b=a/yTGpCd/+hsIy/lL5lslSpFO0NwEDkY4mFa+xLr7ZHPBMwxhfwk+egKNF27R9iFBszHDJrZ12zmFsVn6sCayXIhoxdvCZ3g1Pt6fHp9RRVEk9wGBpVm1Btz1STovJWkunag0qfNBUctUMKOtqFoIzxtImjoctm18uwczgH+OBD6AIsTxXsKp6bLFFrN6oTYK2tehOF2Uakp7TuzyuknT3TgcOznNH4jtrVxNV07QYPbCJYIYdSekDnfzVU6Y77oBU2oD676dtkkqNubgQWsdqvnhv9USqUOxLNEYoO2bSDXHl8W+kp98i2K1WSrrxdWuV3uMiEuBKsVtBJAOH5Tmg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=O++pxZVD18kVLigntuum7ViPVR+tfhWPJXMUlNuxu3OTaT6GHAfCvYQ2btrIYjDvTWEOmfK708WoDQWRif0xghMVaQ7N1EPVir4H40VrYTP6PrSfIKWjKg9eoB5XEyvEZoENlPQhmd/3LSHk0vCOUDqfakF4GWPK5m/08p/okpt+QInPGJ7m7lwJFHaWj0/GaIb0wUDrfYmDFr48Bh7nlTzsS37kmXIvVWFX/OPpi7FCT5GKDWxyMl4btSNlBJZNXYrOfZLo7u4UdSETKGIWzfwmvcrR/4ZRZ7v5u0ihVX4LiTwLTA9tbUu8QkB/Pl8LI1aMj6b/u3FcUdn8HzsDzw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 07:44:17 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 02.03.2022 23:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This makes it behave slightly more like a regular boolean option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Slightly RFC, because there is no easy way of making the opposite "normal
> boolean" case work for no-vpmu.
There's nothing to do to make this work afaict: Generic command line
handling converts "no-<option>" to "<option>=no" for custom params.
Jan
|
