[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:49:29PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:25:10PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > Thinking more about it we actually need to drop the xen_initial_domain() > > > > check otherwise some cases won't be functional (Dom0 not 1:1 mapped, or > > > > DomU 1:1 mapped). > > > > > > Hmm, but that would be the case even before this series, right? > > > > Before this series we only have the xen_swiotlb_detect() check in > > xen_mm_init, we don't have a second xen_initial_domain() check. > > > > The issue is that this series is adding one more xen_initial_domain() > > check in xen_mm_init. > > In current mainline xen_mm_init calls xen_swiotlb_init unconditionally. > But xen_swiotlb_init then calls xen_swiotlb_fixup after allocating > the memory, which in turn calls xen_create_contiguous_region. > xen_create_contiguous_region fails with -EINVAL for the > !xen_initial_domain() and thus caues xen_swiotlb_fixup and > xen_swiotlb_init to unwind and return -EINVAL. > > So as far as I can tell there is no change in behavior, but maybe I'm > missing something subtle? You are right. The xen_initial_domain() check in xen_create_contiguous_region() is wrong and we should get rid of it. It is a leftover from before the xen_swiotlb_detect rework. We could either remove it or change it into another xen_swiotlb_detect() check. Feel free to add the patch to your series or fold it with another patch or rework it as you prefer. Thanks for spotting this! --- arm/xen: don't check for xen_initial_domain() in xen_create_contiguous_region It used to be that Linux enabled swiotlb-xen when running a dom0 on ARM. Since f5079a9a2a31 "xen/arm: introduce XENFEAT_direct_mapped and XENFEAT_not_direct_mapped", Linux detects whether to enable or disable swiotlb-xen based on the new feature flags: XENFEAT_direct_mapped and XENFEAT_not_direct_mapped. However, there is still a leftover xen_initial_domain() check in xen_create_contiguous_region. Remove the check as xen_create_contiguous_region is only called by swiotlb-xen during initialization. If xen_create_contiguous_region is called, we know Linux is running 1:1 mapped so there is no need for additional checks. Also update the in-code comment. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c index a7e54a087b80..28c207060253 100644 --- a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c +++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c @@ -122,10 +122,7 @@ int xen_create_contiguous_region(phys_addr_t pstart, unsigned int order, unsigned int address_bits, dma_addr_t *dma_handle) { - if (!xen_initial_domain()) - return -EINVAL; - - /* we assume that dom0 is mapped 1:1 for now */ + /* the domain is 1:1 mapped to use swiotlb-xen */ *dma_handle = pstart; return 0; }
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |