|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4] vpci/msix: fix PBA accesses
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 09:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.03.2022 17:37, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Map the PBA in order to access it from the MSI-X read and write
> > handlers. Note that previously the handlers would pass the physical
> > host address into the {read,write}{l,q} handlers, which is wrong as
> > those expect a linear address.
> >
> > Map the PBA using ioremap when the first access is performed. Note
> > that 32bit arches might want to abstract the call to ioremap into a
> > vPCI arch handler, so they can use a fixmap range to map the PBA.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> > Cc: Alex Olson <this.is.a0lson@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'll wait a little with committing, in the hope for Alex to re-provide
> a Tested-by.
It works fine for me, you can add "Tested-by: Alex.Olson@xxxxxxxxxx" to the
commit.
>
> > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
> > @@ -182,6 +182,38 @@ static struct vpci_msix_entry *get_entry(struct
> > vpci_msix *msix,
> > return &msix->entries[(addr - start) / PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE];
> > }
> >
> > +static void __iomem *get_pba(struct vpci *vpci)
> > +{
> > + struct vpci_msix *msix = vpci->msix;
> > + /*
> > + * PBA will only be unmapped when the device is deassigned, so access
> > it
> > + * without holding the vpci lock.
> > + */
> > + void __iomem *pba = read_atomic(&msix->pba);
> > +
> > + if ( likely(pba) )
> > + return pba;
> > +
> > + pba = ioremap(vmsix_table_addr(vpci, VPCI_MSIX_PBA),
> > + vmsix_table_size(vpci, VPCI_MSIX_PBA));
> > + if ( !pba )
> > + return read_atomic(&msix->pba);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&vpci->lock);
> > + if ( !msix->pba )
> > + {
> > + write_atomic(&msix->pba, pba);
> > + spin_unlock(&vpci->lock);
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + spin_unlock(&vpci->lock);
> > + iounmap(pba);
> > + }
>
> TBH I had been hoping for just a single spin_unlock(), but you're
> the maintainer of this code ...
>
> Jan
>
Thanks
-Alex
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |