[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/CET: Remove XEN_SHSTK's dependency on EXPERT
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:01:23 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=4zv6pipt6bohpm2pccPj4I9JydfDlQq9W59tUKYPRG4=; b=Nr0x0eblPpZ714p1sbi9C+BDDVxIbir89nLrLc205ISZXgxvD1rZz7V2WFxjBx5TFy4lWz3rFPro1QgDg3RjzmVO1QK2r7UcDklVv+1KNGkY7D2SEwTOogN+SoD8WPKcpZnWKgMbnMoWR5w/xX6Il8tF2FKh5oMW7JZg/F2SdDsI36VRRLhB/xtHPPcZHMbgAfjse9pn5FqfDjUMWZd6zVqcmMCcaSowest19ZWliVRXXA46TtbZqnrYLi1H4Cj9JwIykdDze1gfrlVN6H1OGxUQylHoy36pqRxiHKY1yMiXTo5qxZfRSI/t9wH5RLtEira14sRlgtEePsDve1W71g==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Skjn/SlC5qvvkrb2kysyMMoPKr1rtH52oifecTQ38mGk9gtzcssDY2c9uz240Dd3SCzYpzZzSSUNhUp+4JM99CWFCU9inHz7wSpxTF1db79ZNzpFfPpOpZBrjiNefglUc5cJeKm9f3tjSU1uHEj07EKOqwwDrsQmF6Ss+ByARq3S5Q+qaVNL5AnvTZcA+1TvYzpoEd1KSnSrSthk/D/we11V+6RiU4FvfrriT3ODWdeqG9CAo7iC6nhDUb0ryWdsxHqeDIHui1CeztpJlxHZ9cXmMffMLEw04yr6x3XYjLxetuN7VXWFGtVLM6ewmrJOcPCtdQY0eHHc0C5Swl4s8A==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:01:32 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 09.03.2022 13:39, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ config HVM
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> config XEN_SHSTK
> - bool "Supervisor Shadow Stacks (EXPERT)"
> - depends on HAS_AS_CET_SS && EXPERT
> + bool "Supervisor Shadow Stacks"
> + depends on HAS_AS_CET_SS
We'll need to settle on whether to use your or Jürgen's variant.
As said there I'm in favor of his, but wouldn't mind this
alternative one.
Jan
|
