[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] x86/build: also handle .comment.* in linker script
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:00:03 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=hGARRHqBPhvtCWlzwH1mD9uf1ykPfHdbky0OxeN80vc=; b=bRwl0IPZoIMw58Vdoc4M91HiNBUaC60owmI2KUa6DokoAJm/dWlEXYw3AR+9uIJsQXA11WXaWtbgdrfl5WouN6lXKBvd5SPTGAaX9fupmnQJANL6adPZzdkRkb0fhx4x/bVn8hNQ6sfUij3p4iaAVFssyTK1zjFmNG2GZnpafuRDgFBpG6Wnu17632gkWitjig+t5snWW4i0EEJX+q4bO7mP4MnTc2z6BgG5Tk+c/hAn0Nv+uuNgaGngwsmADVSfvIM3C8eFpKBbGyUw8MtwwF1bHoFBk0bPW9xxpLDnfu57zgRlgXs12PQ49cqactSptrlVo8UsJ0jPhngHZNxzVA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZyIANzUYdg+1LTOVwGKWhwng3XSolz0JJidMiVbAeG4EoP7JbLfzmFiHE9koiQfqPTUDgo+mvtMMTWqooS3KK91wKtodnG0lfzqK7NIX3hOoTXSvIYG5W1re3fZi3l4JNpwfC8AdtsFZHpJblPCpGjAg7Vr8C5AaF0seM+bRw8htaERVgLK5ccpUmZxnxBJjisREXEkQBasSLK8bJJNSkRr3uwcs5S0lnIxbBgxSxfGudrTp+7BzpCNim6quGM1yUwGrI3X15idsNoBwifGAzWTpd8TARvMeSZF95WuF3RvO8qFdPDkZ1PUiLpbpZMbLPWdJ3VJZtLCIv1wnZ0EPQA==
- Authentication-results: esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@citrix.onmicrosoft.com
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:00:45 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:Jr2Dgao9WvUcnv0o3qPYfRWPQO9eBmIVZRIvgKrLsJaIsI4StFCzt garIBmOaK7cNmDyKo1wPo7np0MCvpTRx9AxTgBsrC81QntBo5uZCYyVIHmrMnLJJKUvbq7GA +byyDXkBJppJpMJjk71atANlVEliefQAOCU5NfsYkidfyc9IMsaoU8lyrZRbrJA24DjWVvW4 4qq+qUzBXf+s9JKGjNMg068gEsHUMTa4Fv0aXRnOJinFHeH/5UkJMp3yZOZdhMUcaENdgKOf M7RzanRw4/s10xF5uVJMFrMWhZirrb6ZWBig5fNMkSoqkAqSicais7XOBeAAKv+Zvrgc91Zk b1wWZKMpQgBZqfrlOISTlpkQjBMN4x8+uXHOii1rpnGp6HGWyOEL/RGCUg3OcsT+/ptAHEI/ vsdQNwPRknd3aTsmuv9E7QywJR4RCXoFNp3VnVI1zbWAOxgWZnea67L+cVZzHE7gcUm8fP2O ZRHNmA1PUyojxtnJ1AcJLwGzdyRnnD/WBcG8U7FiqQY/D2GpOB2+Oe0a4eEEjCQfu1Kmm6Iq 2SA+H72ajkKOdraxTeb/3aEgu7UgTi9SI8UDKe/9PNhnBuU3GN7IB8cWEa/oPK5olWjQN8ZI EsRkhfCtoBrqhbtFIOkGUTl/jjU5XbwRua8DcVi4iaBzKXJoDrIF1oObwRDMtw95MUpEGlCO kCyo/vlAjlmsbuwQH2b96uJoT7aBRX5PVPudgdfE1JbvoCLTJUby0uWE409SPLdYsjdQ2mY/ tyckMQpa1z/Z+Yv3r7zw13IiinESnPhHl9svVW/so5IA2pEiG+Zi26AtAOzARVodt/xory9U J8swZT20Qz2JcvR/BFhuc1UdF1T296LMSfHnXlkFIQ7+jKm9haLJN4Mv2EnfB4wYp9fKFcFh XM/XisLufdu0IaCN/crM+pd9ex0pUQfKTgVfq+NNYcfCnSAXASG4DtvdSatM5PFyyARfVUEE c7DK66EVC9CYYw+lWbeb7pNgNcDm3FlrUuOFM+T8vhS+efHDJJjYexeawXmgyFQxP7snTg5B P4EbprUkUoDCLOiCsQVmKZKRW03wbEALcmeg+Rcd/KZIxogH2ckCvTLxqgmdZAjlKNQ/tokN FnkAxcwJIbX7ZEfFTi3Vw==
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:QxFpRKNLgMpLeMBcTs+jsMiBIKoaSvp037BL7SxMoHluGfBw+P rAoB1273HJYVQqOE3I6OrgBEDoexq1n/NICOIqTNSftWfdyQ6VBbAnwYz+wyDxXw3Sn9QtsZ uIqpIOauHNMQ==
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:47:27PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Oldish SUSE compilers generate .comment.SUSE.OPTS sections. Just like we
> already discard such for xen.efi, fold them into .comment for xen-syms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Just like for .comment itself I also wouldn't mind discarding these also
> for the non-EFI case.
I guess there's a reason for compilers to add additional comments, and
we shouldn't discard those randomly?
In any case they won't be loaded, so I don't see much issue with
having them on the binary image.
Thanks, Roger.
|
