[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
preparations for 4.14.5 ?
- To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:16:00 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=UNOxUHuzIjbhV4rTP6rwq1mEc7v5/CQf3ONg4fa4k2E=; b=inIz4QVDF7r07buYGlEFb+/AwLCc4EWtjYexlyFnz5P6o9m85j3S9QJ/Y8GuQxuFDHaC931evLnDNWN3rhEB9jiz8ltXO6sAqEpLzaCs2Q8JLkLctDG5WPvRTo7hsV7syCeWBBLWfVdz6M0Op8KNOO7McOFqKOE16ZKV1Oo44z1u+NngJb0CM5D5vU2ZqJ3EiM6A5SQPEwJB3rdcNw31dJCi3/jL13ARdZArYH/ab6Dz+T9Yppo/qbA0uYT0UdLjv/XcFkZi0xRZYgP+rdLMzNETlKetGnpBWYW5JwYt5/Bx5rDrjEgYJQZVZowr5Qtpoqt8sUZIJ7bvK+XJvj0yyg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ODA8iPtkdpcZASlGKuj0OHLmEZTjlbxcnjOI8RvBs3wrrUS8DbwHWa4DOskfnQ5astNwgmoaTjEKQDlGEgYinbZODdgOjMCdz9at5RqjkdD41K7j6eTZiVn5nJpmS9Mqd/irOJG6d+EWJdWsvbXzrvg6rnQz/VB7S8dWTkZNumE9sdS8dHPOkdQ/2G4FJzoX0zxeKDIRkKJqDD2avH9PVRCe9kZ8V//Qn3u7BQWWqHdNM0/wyAwL0EfA7rzoEJLeH+JL9JCDobgEjex794ApEzTlDQ3Q3ur4guZCL/LMImv5qh5AZQMxdzv7Agy55+dz6o4yHuOPjpQH80VU8lihRg==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:16:25 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
All,
while 4.14's general support period ended in January, we're considering
to cut an out-of-band release due to the relatively large number of
security relevant backports which has accumulated in just 2 months. By
doing this we would _not_ be promising to do so again in the future.
Please voice objections to the plan (or support for it) in the next
couple of days.
Since it's a little easier to "batch" releases, I would intend to keep
4.14.5 aligned with 4.16.1.
Commits I have queued but not committed to the branch yet (and I won't
until in a couple of days time, to allow for objections to the plan to
be raised):
dd6c062a7a4a tools/libxl: Correctly align the ACPI tables
aa390d513a67 build: fix exported variable name CFLAGS_stack_boundary
e62cc29f9b6c tools/libs: Fix build dependencies
eddf13b5e940 x86emul: fix VPBLENDMW with mask and memory operand
6bd1b4d35c05 x86/console: process softirqs between warning prints
07449ecfa425 tools/libxl: don't allow IOMMU usage with PoD
10454f381f91 xz: avoid overlapping memcpy() with invalid input with in-place
decompression
0a21660515c2 xz: validate the value before assigning it to an enum variable
b4f211606011 vpci/msix: fix PBA accesses
Please point out backports you find missing from both the respective
staging branch and the list above, but which you consider relevant.
Jan
|