[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] xen/cpupool: Don't allow removing cpu0 from cpupool0
- To: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:57:52 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=qcSxRGKWIyXVsTcm+6OyqMKTxR49DC5OvdmGcWW3kc4=; b=dNKuSQYFEl/9kf2z4QMNZ7GgsR+jiAwQIZWhAj2hJApwCFSKAlXyCxDUS7gHbQBP9U5ULr8qIZx49n98ncyJCKgTkAOtQl7bbsNAa4zkCFVg08fnvTgVHFPaYNbOcxrrDSm0E5xRqXBk/gyklqCqDFXcaqT7Bm0IUDmW5yup/hPSlyfEoxnSPLGIsDengTnykEUuKsL2QchwRkDEtlBOt1n2Fq5FYGeJZ9KfX9y218CM/DTldWPFZol+h7iNgRM4Hf/AXcjtwrGQnazvKwjPZxxhHOkG5+4xWiPx1J2s69khzlwEJ5feSLclTSq+9n8PQZzCTTkWisZhmxRwlVDJmQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bOa/VGOJWx0PPwZCJJXESkOSnpXn0ytqpCCO8SwyuipQofZKuNvLTikdLIQya/4MzedZAjfkHSIfrK7xxcDbd3vfBzpf6qU0bJnytD1HuVgWKg+4TrmHuO3LXFIrtwCFcD8NeEjjCnsFFpDJ9bL36TNDShJoQyhq0T2SL9QhgwNHelht4dTi5cck6xHQ9+HXTolDyFclXZ7P2GTsqvW/aWpcEx0Ulb4Oz6ImHG8ji2BSKx7pqr3tpTLCW0iif9Bq71MJ332cNVzHyEZ3zZX/PPUfhUSjhLlcQSgsL41eKKEzz2ewMpfiCaenD0ppCAwnpbWsKCoSZJPAfTHgkU+wIA==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:58:27 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHYTbfhTkT1+2FTCUa/iQjDpfI7J6z48pQA
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v7 5/7] xen/cpupool: Don't allow removing cpu0 from cpupool0
> On 11 Apr 2022, at 16:20, Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cpu0 must remain in cpupool0, otherwise some operations like moving cpus
> between cpupools, cpu hotplug, destroying cpupools, shutdown of the host,
> might not work in a sane way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v7:
> - new patch
> ---
> xen/common/sched/cpupool.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c b/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c
> index 86a175f99cd5..0a93bcc631bf 100644
> --- a/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched/cpupool.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static long cf_check cpupool_unassign_cpu_helper(void
> *info)
> * possible failures:
> * - last cpu and still active domains in cpupool
> * - cpu just being unplugged
> + * - Attempt to remove boot cpu from cpupool0
> */
> static int cpupool_unassign_cpu(struct cpupool *c, unsigned int cpu)
> {
> @@ -582,7 +583,12 @@ static int cpupool_unassign_cpu(struct cpupool *c,
> unsigned int cpu)
> debugtrace_printk("cpupool_unassign_cpu(pool=%u,cpu=%d)\n",
> c->cpupool_id, cpu);
>
> - if ( !cpu_online(cpu) )
> + /*
> + * Cpu0 must remain in cpupool0, otherwise some operations like moving
> cpus
> + * between cpupools, cpu hotplug, destroying cpupools, shutdown of the
> host,
> + * might not work in a sane way.
> + */
> + if ( (!c->cpupool_id && !cpu) || !cpu_online(cpu) )
> return -EINVAL;
>
> master_cpu = sched_get_resource_cpu(cpu);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Hi,
I’m going to address the comment on this serie before re-pushing it, I see there
are no comments on this patch, so I’m wondering, when you have time, if you
can give me some feedback on this one.
Cheers,
Luca
|