[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m_set_entry duplicate calculation.
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Paran Lee wrote: > It doesn't seem necessary to do that calculation of order shift again. > > Signed-off-by: Paran Lee <p4ranlee@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > index 1d1059f7d2..533afc830a 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ int p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m, > while ( nr ) > { > unsigned long mask; > - unsigned long order; > + unsigned long order, pages; > > /* > * Don't take into account the MFN when removing mapping (i.e > @@ -1118,11 +1118,12 @@ int p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m, > if ( rc ) > break; > > - sgfn = gfn_add(sgfn, (1 << order)); > + pages = 1 << order; > + sgfn = gfn_add(sgfn, pages); > if ( !mfn_eq(smfn, INVALID_MFN) ) > - smfn = mfn_add(smfn, (1 << order)); > + smfn = mfn_add(smfn, pages); > > - nr -= (1 << order); > + nr -= pages; > } > > return rc; > -- > 2.25.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |