[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] xen: do not merge reserved pages in free_heap_pages()
Hi, On 27/04/2022 10:27, Penny Zheng wrote: This sentence tells me that the merge can happen but it doesn't tell me the cases. I think the second part is more important to know.There is a slim chance that free_heap_pages() may decide to merge a chunk from the static region(PGC_reserved) with the about-to-be-free chunk. The code in free_heap_Pages() will try to merge with the successor/predecessor if they are suitably aligned. So the issue can only happen if the pages reserved are right next to the pages given to the heap allocator. So in order to avoid the above scenario, this commit updates free_heap_pages() to check whether the predecessor and/or successor has PGC_reserved set, when trying to merge the about-to-be-freed chunk with the predecessor and/or successor. Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx> --- v3 changes: - no changes --- v2 changes: - new commit --- xen/common/page_alloc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c index be501582a3..1f3ad4bd28 100644 --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c @@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ static void free_heap_pages( /* Merge with predecessor block? */ if ( !mfn_valid(page_to_mfn(predecessor)) || !page_state_is(predecessor, free) || + (predecessor->count_info & PGC_reserved) || (PFN_ORDER(predecessor) != order) || (phys_to_nid(page_to_maddr(predecessor)) != node) ) break; @@ -1506,6 +1507,7 @@ static void free_heap_pages( /* Merge with successor block? */ if ( !mfn_valid(page_to_mfn(successor)) || !page_state_is(successor, free) || + (successor->count_info & PGC_reserved) || (PFN_ORDER(successor) != order) || (phys_to_nid(page_to_maddr(successor)) != node) ) break; Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |