[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 24/30] panic: Refactor the panic path
- To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, pmladek@xxxxxxxx, kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:04:01 -0300
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, coresight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, halves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabiomirmar@xxxxxxxxx, alejandro.j.jimenez@xxxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx, feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hidehiro.kawai.ez@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:05:04 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 27/04/2022 21:28, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/22 15:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> + crash_kexec_post_notifiers
>> + This was DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>
> This is DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>
>> + parameter "panic_notifiers_level" - check its entry
>> + in this documentation for details on how it works.
>> + Setting this parameter is exactly the same as setting
>> + "panic_notifiers_level=4".
>
Thanks Randy, for your suggestion - but I confess I couldn't understand
it properly. It's related to spaces/tabs, right? What you suggest me to
change in this formatting? Just by looking the email I can't parse.
Cheers,
Guilherme
|
