[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 04/20] kernel: Add combined power-off+restart handler call chain API
- To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:10:33 +0300
- Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joshua Thompson <funaho@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@xxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux PM <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-tegra <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 06 May 2022 15:10:59 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 4/20/22 21:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> + void (*platform_power_off_cb)(void);
>>>> + void (*simple_power_off_cb)(void *data);
>>>> + void *simple_power_off_cb_data;
>>> Is there any particular reason to put these callbacks here and not
>>> directly into struct sys_off_handler?
>> They are used internally by reboot.c and shouldn't be touched by the
>> kernel API users, so I wanted to factor out and protect all the private
>> data.
> But they come from these users anyway, don't they?
>
Yes, the point is that these callback pointers are owned by the kernel
core while callbacks are registered.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
|