[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v2 1/9] xen/arm: introduce static shared memory


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 06:43:18 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yEiiX07JvvGPBAErHzJhNAJamY4VBqiqKSdmZWhzzOo=; b=YVuJ4myuZCvu/9sd3/sG7o1OjoyYkER0zdQi8FW2EyRO00hvrsuo2L/eVYG4gMIkT5Cup4U3Jucx7cAL1hohSflbj+kCca64020mpGcf0ut1+eNtlPyT00OmeDk5KzA4eicxZoeRJ6kBn43qDVASPqJGqOJI/YbYIBkPv+dFf5xUPaxEiwJoIKN5D0vFgX9kU9aX+ilYeYHYqKBYY6GyCBrX+oN56mTco+qLHfoQnlZ6B1wln+Bd13QjsBUF9gk08sdemkxpu5QU+sNsm4txwn8e56QbE2+04ILHZSbUGnD5GdXNtdzpQ8qTY3t8TfEUgfxsOgGPu4dOJu3350pgSw==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yEiiX07JvvGPBAErHzJhNAJamY4VBqiqKSdmZWhzzOo=; b=OAtbJQaMMa5JHTH5EVBaPv/gcmHGROlQdUerXhbh5ZGiMdkHGoNdBMlKZPyZmaquRPKMyN0TayopsYyRScMUmUwc1i6PZKtapWAVO9D/EGW01+wRs+BhESPKZsQGpTkpbhqWHjmZf8Rwq8NFi/lK0Tb3tBUjZM4SdttM7wye5k+3u2lZiVPEbedwEZm2u8qBOTt/ghTQmvUHZYfNLyaBB6Fvh+UiBjUywW7FqHYUXLBcMTuVB3B6KyemecTXASlJolVvkUzssk15KMnGmysiPFVdI49wfc8wrHfy74OWkoVItsKxqtTR5VPKqqx/NMUbMWjFfb8O+YqbTo975lQS9Q==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=KtBIBoPTFLOdCeKXpGMrNhN4uf+jGeH45NtKrSplykV2dAyngvP9CYpxFhHUmg/jgStPibUi5DPV/eaEs2k0CtTUjqbjEqKnv0yC2W/uZLt40qErbbGXqiXawNgLGjOc2azOQvp/f46qX2Sev0KEceTV/9l9VMW5feoykrSG8roBaUKV4QEQjtx8J4GEgjNCvrHv3q0dKocRnESjNJZITyi3A8nJqmWGUsKArW0HXVb2hWM2T1dNuC9jaelstg5khgSUWyiESNIwKq0qI1TkF9l49IU4ErnMIu/6jDVLjRLktcpdrn7qvVaWoYyIQVYH2upYbAKPL/VNPjHOMODc/A==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=KkO4E+h0z8ZzKIrp3hOUF2MVb9+NQC+lW65uWeYfUl2QXBLByCx0MJO5PlRrt6/v8vyVCLQ/xdBeNmpwmk+PtMBwd95z7mEeXBStlurgJKGtnIa+V0URlYsGaKF6Cnli9habJfwMNN8xod2N4EBFDVF5SLBhctzXHc2gwMMSDNSGCqe8EzXXud632R06ULfdqOXegB9dyqyseQt/XtoWY9qEpU6GxPng3jZsOowVG1XKGBd+ny4G3pRV7RtDcEqPI4w8EJXJS3qoUdIKc0ZyQC7Vlfho8+yefRyhtB2KJ5Fgyidp7sA9NCyDZp8obRLbke7H76KOlfe6vs5R6uUmnw==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 07 May 2022 06:43:53 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHYYRqKvHG5G59kK0mtK53ka20rwa0Sm7eAgABc2oA=
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 1/9] xen/arm: introduce static shared memory

Hi Stefano

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 9:08 AM
> To: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>; Bertrand
> Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>; Volodymyr Babchuk
> <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] xen/arm: introduce static shared memory
> 
> On Fri, 6 May 2022, Penny Zheng wrote:
> > From: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch serie introduces a new feature: setting up static shared
> > memory on a dom0less system, through device tree configuration.
> >
> > This commit parses shared memory node at boot-time, and reserve it in
> > bootinfo.reserved_mem to avoid other use.
> >
> > This commits proposes a new Kconfig CONFIG_STATIC_SHM to wrap
> > static-shm-related codes, and this option depends on static memory(
> > CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY). That's because that later we want to reuse a
> > few helpers, guarded with CONFIG_STATIC_MEMORY, like
> > acquire_staticmem_pages, etc, on static shared memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks Penny, this version of the series is already so much better than v1! I
> have only few minor comments left on the series. One NIT at the bottom of
> this file.
>
> 
> > ---
> > v2 change:
> > - document refinement
> > - remove bitmap and use the iteration to check
> > - add a new field nr_shm_domain to keep the number of shared domain
> > ---
> >  docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 120
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  xen/arch/arm/Kconfig                  |   6 ++
> >  xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c                |  68 +++++++++++++++
> >  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h      |   3 +
> >  4 files changed, 197 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> > b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> > index a94125394e..e63ce171fc 100644
> > --- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> > +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> > @@ -355,3 +355,123 @@ device-tree:
> >
> >  This will reserve a 512MB region starting at the host physical
> > address
> >  0x30000000 to be exclusively used by DomU1.
> > +
> > +Static Shared Memory
> > +====================
> > +
> > +The static shared memory device tree nodes allow users to statically
> > +set up shared memory on dom0less system, enabling domains to do
> > +shm-based communication.
> > +
> > +- compatible
> > +
> > +    "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1"
> > +
> > +- xen,shm-id
> > +
> > +    An u8 value represents the unique identifier of the shared memory 
> > region.
> > +    The maximum identifier shall be "xen,shm-id = <0xff>".
> > +
> > +- xen,shared-mem
> > +
> > +    An array takes a physical address, which is the base address of the
> > +    shared memory region in host physical address space, a size, and a 
> > guest
> > +    physical address, as the target address of the mapping. The number of
> cells
> > +    for the host address (and size) is the same as the guest 
> > pseudo-physical
> > +    address and they are inherited from the parent node.
> > +
> > +- role (Optional)
> > +
> > +    A string property specifying the ownership of a shared memory region,
> > +    the value must be one of the following: "owner", or "borrower"
> > +    A shared memory region could be explicitly backed by one domain, which
> is
> > +    called "owner domain", and all the other domains who are also sharing
> > +    this region are called "borrower domain".
> > +    If not specified, the default value is "borrower" and owner is
> > +    "dom_shared", a system domain.
> > +
> > +As an example:
> > +
> > +chosen {
> > +    #address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +    #size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +    xen,xen-bootargs = "console=dtuart dtuart=serial0 bootscrub=0";
> > +
> > +    ......
> > +
> > +    /* this is for Dom0 */
> > +    dom0-shared-mem@10000000 {
> > +        compatible = "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1";
> > +        role = "owner";
> > +        xen,shm-id = <0x0>;
> > +        xen,shared-mem = <0x10000000 0x10000000 0x10000000>;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    domU1 {
> > +        compatible = "xen,domain";
> > +        #address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +        #size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +        memory = <0 131072>;
> > +        cpus = <2>;
> > +        vpl011;
> > +
> > +        /*
> > +         * shared memory region identified as 0x0(xen,shm-id = <0x0>)
> > +         * is shared between Dom0 and DomU1.
> > +         */
> > +        domU1-shared-mem@10000000 {
> > +            compatible = "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1";
> > +            role = "borrower";
> > +            xen,shm-id = <0x0>;
> > +            xen,shared-mem = <0x10000000 0x10000000 0x50000000>;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        /*
> > +         * shared memory region identified as 0x1(xen,shm-id = <0x1>)
> > +         * is shared between DomU1 and DomU2.
> > +         */
> > +        domU1-shared-mem@50000000 {
> > +            compatible = "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1";
> > +            xen,shm-id = <0x1>;
> > +            xen,shared-mem = <0x50000000 0x20000000 0x60000000>;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        ......
> > +
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    domU2 {
> > +        compatible = "xen,domain";
> > +        #address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +        #size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +        memory = <0 65536>;
> > +        cpus = <1>;
> > +
> > +        /*
> > +         * shared memory region identified as 0x1(xen,shm-id = <0x1>)
> > +         * is shared between domU1 and domU2.
> > +         */
> > +        domU2-shared-mem@50000000 {
> > +            compatible = "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1";
> > +            xen,shm-id = <0x1>;
> > +            xen,shared-mem = <0x50000000 0x20000000 0x70000000>;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        ......
> > +    };
> > +};
> > +
> > +This is an example with two static shared memory regions.
> > +
> > +For the static shared memory region identified as 0x0, host physical
> > +address starting at 0x10000000 of 256MB will be reserved to be shared
> > +between
> > +Dom0 and DomU1. It will get mapped at 0x10000000 in Dom0 guest
> > +physical address space, and at 0x50000000 in DomU1 guest physical
> > +address space. Dom0 is explicitly defined as the owner domain, and DomU1
> is the borrower domain.
> > +
> > +For the static shared memory region identified as 0x1, host physical
> > +address starting at 0x50000000 of 512MB will be reserved to be shared
> > +between
> > +DomU1 and DomU2. It will get mapped at 0x60000000 in DomU1 guest
> > +physical address space, and at 0x70000000 in DomU2 guest physical
> > +address space. DomU1 and DomU2 are both the borrower domain, the
> > +owner domain is the default owner domain dom_shared.
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig index
> > ecfa6822e4..5ee9921f56 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ config TEE
> >
> >  source "arch/arm/tee/Kconfig"
> >
> > +config STATIC_SHM
> > +   bool "Statically shared memory on a dom0less system" if
> UNSUPPORTED
> > +   depends on STATIC_MEMORY
> > +   help
> > +     This option enables statically shared memory on a dom0less system.
> > +
> >  endmenu
> >
> >  menu "ARM errata workaround via the alternative framework"
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c index
> > e318ef9603..9bd08776a7 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> > @@ -363,6 +363,70 @@ static int __init process_domain_node(const void
> *fdt, int node,
> >                                     size_cells,
> > &bootinfo.reserved_mem, true);  }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_SHM
> > +static int __init process_shm_node(const void *fdt, int node,
> > +                                   u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells)
> > +{
> > +    const struct fdt_property *prop;
> > +    const __be32 *cell;
> > +    paddr_t paddr, size;
> > +    struct meminfo *mem = &bootinfo.reserved_mem;
> > +    unsigned long i;
> > +
> > +    if ( address_cells < 1 || size_cells < 1 )
> > +    {
> > +        printk("fdt: invalid #address-cells or #size-cells for static 
> > shared memory
> node.\n");
> > +        return -EINVAL;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "xen,shared-mem", NULL);
> > +    if ( !prop )
> > +        return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * xen,shared-mem = <paddr, size, gaddr>;
> > +     * Memory region starting from physical address #paddr of #size shall
> > +     * be mapped to guest physical address #gaddr as static shared memory
> > +     * region.
> > +     */
> > +    cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
> > +    device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, &paddr, &size);
> > +    for ( i = 0; i < mem->nr_banks; i++ )
> > +    {
> > +        /*
> > +         * A static shared memory region could be shared between multiple
> > +         * domains.
> > +         */
> > +        if ( paddr == mem->bank[i].start && size == mem->bank[i].size )
> > +            break;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if ( i == mem->nr_banks )
> > +    {
> > +        if ( i < NR_MEM_BANKS )
> > +        {
> > +            /* Static shared memory shall be reserved from any other use. 
> > */
> > +            mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].start = paddr;
> > +            mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].size = size;
> > +            mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].xen_domain = true;
> > +            mem->nr_banks++;
> > +        }
> > +        else
> > +        {
> > +            printk("Warning: Max number of supported memory regions
> reached.\n");
> > +            return -ENOSPC;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +    /*
> > +     * keep a count of the number of domains, which later may be used to
> > +     * calculate the number of the reference count.
> > +     */
> > +    mem->bank[i].nr_shm_domain++;
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
> >                                    int node, const char *name, int depth,
> >                                    u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells,
> > @@ -383,6 +447,10 @@ static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
> >          process_chosen_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells, size_cells);
> >      else if ( depth == 2 && device_tree_node_compatible(fdt, node,
> "xen,domain") )
> >          rc = process_domain_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells,
> > size_cells);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_SHM
> > +    else if ( depth <= 3 && device_tree_node_compatible(fdt, node,
> "xen,domain-shared-memory-v1") )
> > +        rc = process_shm_node(fdt, node, address_cells, size_cells);
> > +#endif
> >
> >      if ( rc < 0 )
> >          printk("fdt: node `%s': parsing failed\n", name); diff --git
> > a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
> > index 7a1e1d6798..38e02ced36 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h
> > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ struct membank {
> >      paddr_t start;
> >      paddr_t size;
> >      bool xen_domain; /* whether the memory bank is bound to a Xen
> > domain. */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_SHM
> > +    unsigned long nr_shm_domain;
> > +#endif
> 
> This is a NIT but unsigned int would be more than enough. The benefit is that
> the following uint8_t end up not needing extra memory on arm64. I realize
> this is an overoptimization so it is fine anyway.
> 

Oh, padding! Learned it, I'll fix thanks~~~

> Other than this, the patch looks good to me.



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.