[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/perf: expose LBR format in PERF_CAPABILITIES
- To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:10:31 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=uUQXC3Fq79Y/LyBYuv63z+vROOqFqA4Hte1H/F2uajI=; b=Pd1buDryNoifgeYoaqqZmF4qjILUnrawtfEbFcdz4yIl1ErZEGfOFHzm4PLhpmjHM5IC/tPbxZ8wU54mlz0Ps7xh8hoU/G+/TISlKqkRkghVlubS1CFEuhXV5DcIGFI3DiFO1L61PRm4Q2n5gu5OziKN604K11aw+sSdl+nmkGbUK02B7mOlNe7u11RgwU3WZZx47hyDVdTLmYexvo0wVN6uQyP7ayNSEq4Bux5WIOQHll+ZtCuylJal91OkXkZcs6MbqhjWVPFWzpQRfBH27JYWYPWR4ISocvBDar/cjZO49ONfGZHoBZjQAWgtCBaG+VNT9E/+z7raV98JalNlrg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dJ/uB8ljyp3D1n10AG7tbe1klL9jtFYud07m/6gWVJUzWFy4q2t58/wqGZqx5rkzfsjAN/D6+F3HWwETox+AVNfw2uSobDqyXGDN3fwH48u5m9B+5vwJXN8aWmBHR4b20ciU0UaxawFCU18vR7XBwPb1sP/eqXh6ODWMOqXOYK/rS+mJRksY51L7vx0IL4o/NYot33yTbOoYZMVGi0YyakzUz49BR1fNqFj5DJC3FL/imk6RkToZyA5EvZRdmhxu2R83D62yoBYS2M43mAiNBFMU5d1fJU9ndEa3CXY+RLOx5a0ythxEXou96VqtWVO6w07iR45JRxJcxMdD1THW3A==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:10:43 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:dWr6u61MpLzYoZ27J/bD5aBwkn2cJEfYwER7XKvMYLTBsI5bp2BSz WEXCGmDPK6MamH9f4p2ady0pksHv5CExoNqHAU5pC1hF35El5HIVI+TRqvS04J+DSFhoGZPt Zh2hgzodZhsJpPkjk7xdOCn9xGQ7InQLlbGILes1htZGEk1EU/NtTo5w7Rj2tMy2YDga++wk YiaT/P3aQfNNwFcagr424rbwP+4lK2v0N+wlgVWicFj5DcypVFMZH4sDfjZw0/DaptVBoaHq 9Prl9lVyI97EyAFUbtJmp6jGqEDryW70QKm0hK6UID66vROS7BbPg/W+5PwZG8O4whlkeydx /1znIS+aFw4L5HRv/sDcT5yP3BTMINJreqvzXiX6aR/zmXgWl61m7BLMxtzOocVvOFqHWtJ6 PoUbigXaQyOjP63x7T9TfRwgsMkL4/gO4Z3VnNIlGmFS6p5B82eBfySvLe03x9p7ixKNd/Ya 9AUdnxEaxPYbgcUElwWFIg/jKGjgXyXnzhw9wjM9PFsujG7IApZ7aPiLvT5IcSxRe51uxq6g 0iaon3JK0RPXDCY4X/fmp62vcffkCW+VI8MGbmQ8v9xnEbV1mEVEAcRV1awvb++kEHWc9BVJ lEQ+yEuhbMv70HtRd74NzWnpFaUsxhaXMBfe9DW8ymIw6vQpgOGXG4NS2cZbMR87ZdvAzs3y lWOgtXlQyR1t6GYQm6c8bHSqi6uPS8SLikJYipsoRY53uQPabob1nrnJuuP2obs5jEpMVkcG wy3kRU=
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:+dWFwqNsFwdP7sBcT5j255DYdb4zR+YMi2TDiHoddfUFSKalfp 6V98jzjSWE8wr4WBkb6LO90DHpewKRyXcH2/hqAV7EZniohILIFvAu0WKG+VHd8kLFh4lgPM tbEpSWTeeAdWSS7vyKrjVQcexQpuVvmZrA7Yix854ud3ASV0gK1XYaNu/vKDwTeOAwP+tdKH Pz3Kp6jgvlXU5SQtWwB3EDUeSGjcbMjojabRkPAANiwBWSjBuzgYSKUySw71M7aXdi0L0i+W /Kn0jS/aO4qcy2zRfayiv684lWot380dFObfb8yfT9aw+cyDpAVr4RH4FqjwpF591HL2xa1u Ukli1QevibLUmhJ11d7yGdgzUImwxelkMKgWXo/UcL5/aJBQ7SQvAx+76wOHHimjUdlcA536 RR022DsZ1LSRvGgSTm/tDNEwpnj0yuvBMZ4KYuZlFkIP0jgYVq3MUiFYJuYeU9NTO/7JpiHP hlDcna6voTeVSGb2rBtm0qxNC3RHw8EhqPX0BH46WuonJrtWE8y1FdyN0Un38G+p54Q55Y5/ 7cOqAtkL1VVMcZYa90Ge9ES8qqDW7GRw7KLQupUB/aPbBCP2iIp4/84b0z6u3vcJsUzIEqkJ CES19cvX5aQTOYNSRP5uw+zvngehTMYd228LAu23FQgMyOeJP7dSueVVspj8ys5/0CH8yzYY fHBK5r
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: AQHYbE7auBjYBybQdEGztrNyxSKPiK0nzhyA
- Thread-topic: [PATCH 3/5] x86/perf: expose LBR format in PERF_CAPABILITIES
On 20/05/2022 14:37, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Allow exposing the PDCM bit in CPUID for HVM guests if present on the
> platform, which in turn allows exposing PERF_CAPABILITIES. Limit the
> information exposed in PERF_CAPABILITIES to the LBR format only.
>
> This is helpful as hardware without model-specific LBRs set format to
> 0x3f in order to notify the feature is not present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Seeing as we have never exposed PDCM in CPUID I wonder whether there's
> something that I'm missing that makes exposing PERF_CAPABILITIES LBR
> format not as trivial as it looks.
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/msr.c | 9 +++++++++
> xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
> index 01a15857b7..423a795d1d 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ int guest_rdmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t
> *val)
> *val = 0;
> break;
>
> + case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> + if ( !cp->basic.pdcm )
> + goto gp_fault;
> +
> + /* Only report LBR format. */
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, *val);
> + *val &= MSR_IA32_PERF_CAP_LBR_FORMAT;
Urgh. We should have this info cached from boot. Except caching on
boot is broken on hybrid cpus. The P and E cores of an AlderLake report
a different format iirc (they differ between linear, and effective addr).
Given the other pain points with hybrid cpus, I think we can ignore it
in the short term.
> + break;
> +
> case MSR_X2APIC_FIRST ... MSR_X2APIC_LAST:
> if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) || v != curr )
> goto gp_fault;
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
> b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
> index cd6409f9f3..5fdaec43c5 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ XEN_CPUFEATURE(SSSE3, 1*32+ 9) /*A Supplemental
> Streaming SIMD Extensio
> XEN_CPUFEATURE(FMA, 1*32+12) /*A Fused Multiply Add */
> XEN_CPUFEATURE(CX16, 1*32+13) /*A CMPXCHG16B */
> XEN_CPUFEATURE(XTPR, 1*32+14) /* Send Task Priority Messages */
> -XEN_CPUFEATURE(PDCM, 1*32+15) /* Perf/Debug Capability MSR */
> +XEN_CPUFEATURE(PDCM, 1*32+15) /*S Perf/Debug Capability MSR */
This is the bit which requires more toolstack logic to safely enable.
Using 's' for off-by-default is fine if we want to get the series in now.
But before we expose the MSR generally, we need to:
1) Put the configuration in msr_policy so the toolstack can reason about it
2) Reject migration attempts to destinations where the LBR format changes
3) Actually put the lBR registers in the migration stream
~Andrew
|